Government Of Nct Of Delhi Through Secretary vs. Harmesh Sandhu
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
28 May 2015
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
\2201 ITEM NO.5 COURT NO.7 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 28270/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 14/12/2015 in WPC No. 6859/2015 passed by the High Court Of Delhi At New Delhi) DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Petitioner(s) VERSUS ARUN SAHNI AND ORS Respondent(s) (with office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 28271/2016 (with Office Report) SLP(C) No. 28272/2016 (with Office Report) SLP(C) No. 28274/2016 (with Office Report) SLP(C) No. 28276/2016 (with Office Report) SLP(C) No. 28277/2016 (with Office Report) SLP(C) No. 28279/2016 (with Office Report) SLP(C) No. 28281/2016 (with Office Report) SLP(C) No. 28283/2016 (with Office Report) Date : 20/02/2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI For Petitioner(s) Mr. Vishnu B. Saharya, Adv. Mr. Viresh B. Saharya, Adv. For M/s Saharya & Co. 2 Ms. Garima Prashad, Adv. Mr. Ashwani Kumar, Adv. Mr. Jay Kumar Bhardwaj, Adv. Ms. Rachana Srivastava, Adv. Mr. Sukrit R. Kapoor, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Gopal Sankaranarayan, Adv. Mr. Sumeer Sodhi, Adv. Ms. Zeeshan Diwan, Adv. Mr. Arjun Nanda, Adv. Mr. T. Mahipal, Adv. Mr. D. Ramakrishna Reddy, Adv. Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, Adv. Mr. N. Prabhakar, Adv. Mr. Gopal Jha, Adv. Mr. G. R. Pandey, Adv. Mr. R. R. Kumar, Adv. Mr. Swetank Shantanu, Adv. Ms. Vernika Tomar, Adv. Mr. Rajender Pd. Saxena, Adv. Mr. N. P. Sahni, Adv. Mr. Krishan Kumar, Adv. Mr. Pankaj Verma, Adv. Mr. Krishan Kumar, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP (C) No. 28270 of 2016 Counter Affidavit be filed within six weeks. Rejoinder Affidavit, if any, be filed within two weeks
thereafter. List after eight weeks. SLP(C) No. 28271/2016 Service is not complete in this matter. The petitioner shall take fresh steps for completion of service on the unserved respondent(s) within four weeks from today. 3 Post after four weeks. SLP(C) No. 28272/2016 Counter Affidavit be filed within six weeks. Rejoinder Affidavit, if any, be filed within two weeks thereafter. List after eight weeks. SLP(C) No. 28274/2016 Counter Affidavit be filed within six weeks. Rejoinder Affidavit, if any, be filed within two weeks thereafter. List after eight weeks. SLP(C) No. 28276/2016 It is reported by the learned counsel that the pleadings are complete in this matter. Post for hearing after four weeks. SLP(C) No. 28277/2016 By way of last chance, two more weeks' time is granted to the petitioner to file requisite affidavit. It is made clear that in case the affidavit is not filed within the stipulated time, it will be taken that they have no merits in their contentions and the Special Leave Petition is liable to be dismissed and the officer(s) responsible for the loss will be personally liable. SLP(C) No. 28279/2016 Counter Affidavit be filed within six weeks. Rejoinder Affidavit, if any, be filed within two weeks thereafter. List after eight weeks. 4 SLP(C) No. 28281/2016 De-tag. Post this matter along with the other cases of subsequent purchasers, pending in the Registry. SLP(C) No. 28283/2016 Post this matter along with the other cases of subsequent purchasers, pending in the Registry. Counter Affidavit be filed within six weeks. (Jayant Kumar Arora) Court Master (Renu Diwan) Assistant Registrar