Amol vs. The State Of Maharashtra

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble Hon'Ble The Chief Justice, Surya Kant
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:18 Jul 2022
CNR:SCIN010169622021

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

After Week/Month/Vacation

Before:

Hon'ble Hon'Ble The Chief Justice, Hon'ble Krishna Murari, Hon'ble Hima Kohli

Stage:

FRESH (FOR ADMISSION) - CRIMINAL CASES

Remarks:

Dismissed

Listed On:

18 Jul 2022

In:

Judge

Category:

UNKNOWN

Interlocutory Applications:

88730/2021,88731/2021,88732/2021,97911/2021,

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 03-07-2021 in IA No. 971/2021 passed by the High Court of Judicature at

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA Respondent(s)

(IA No. 88730/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT, IA No. 88731/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. AND IA No. 97911/2021 – INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT AND IA No. 88732/2021 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES)

Date : 18-07-2022 These matters were called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

Reason:

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA MURARI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI

  • For Petitioner(s) Mr. K. Parameshwaran,Adv. Mr. Anand Dilip Landge, AOR
  • For Respondent(s) Mr. Rahul Chitnis, Adv. Mr. Sachin Patil, AOR Mr. Aaditya A. Pande, Adv. Mr. Geo Joseph, Adv. Ms. Shewtal Shepal, Adv. Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar, AOR

Ms. Suvarna S. Ganu, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

1. Having heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and on carefully perusing the material placed on record, we see no reason to interfere with the impugned order passed by the High Court. Digitally signed by Rajni Mukhi Date: 2022.07.19 18:43:41 IST Signature Not Verified

2. The Special Leave Petition is, accordingly, dismissed.

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A

Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No. 5422/2021

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

VERSUS

AMOL Petitioner(s)

Bombay)

3. However, the petitioner is at liberty to renew his prayer made in application after six months.

4. Consequent upon dismissal of the Special Leave Petition, the pending interlocutory application(s) including application for impleadment also stand disposed of.

(RAJNI MUKHI) (R.S. NARAYANAN)

COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(4) - 18 Jul 2022

ROP - of Main Case

Viewing

Order(3) - 25 Mar 2022

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(2) - 30 Sept 2021

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(1) - 3 Aug 2021

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view