ITEM NO.3

(Revised) COURT NO.12 SECTION IX SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 19730/2021

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 10-03-2021 in WP No. 8818/2018 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Bombay)

THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER NASIK ZILLA PARISHAD, NASIK & ANR. Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

NITIN DATTATRAY PAWAR & ORS.

Respondent $(s)$

(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.155759/2021-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.155760/2021-EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT)

Date: 13-04-2022 This petition was called on for hearing today.

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V. NAGARATHNA

For Petitioner(s) Mr. Prashant R. Dahat, Adv. Mr. T. R. B. Sivakumar, AOR

Mr. Prashant Shrikant Kenjale, AOR For Respondent(s)

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following $0$ R D E R

It is not in dispute that, prior to 04.09.2018, the District Awardees were entitled to get the additional increment. It was only pursuant to the Circular dated 04.09.2018, the District Awardees were not entitled to get the additional increment. Therefore, for the period prior to 04.09.2018, the District Awardees were entitled to <pre>get the additional increment</pre> and $\cdot$ therefore, no error has been committed by the High Court $in$ directing the benefit of additional increment to the District Awardees for the period prior to 04.09.2018.

We are in complete agreement with the view taken by the High ature Not Verified<br> TT.

The Special Leave Petition stands dismissed.

Pending applications stand disposed of.

(R. NATARAJAN) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS (NISHA TRIPATHI) BRANCH OFFICER

ITEM NO.3 COURT NO.12 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 19730/2021

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 10-03-2021 in WP No. 8818/2018 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Bombay)

THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER NASIK ZILLA PARISHAD, NASIK & ANR. Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

NITIN DATTATRAY PAWAR & ORS. Respondent(s)

(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.155759/2021-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.155760/2021-EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT)

Date : 13-04-2022 This petition was called on for hearing today.

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V. NAGARATHNA

For Petitioner(s) Mr. Prashant R. Dahat, Adv. Mr. T. R. B. Sivakumar, AOR

For Respondent(s) Mr. Prashant Shrikant Kenjale, AOR

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

It is not in dispute that, prior to 04.09.2018, the District Awardees were not entitled to get the additional increment. It was only pursuant to the Circular dated 04.09.2018, the District Awardees were not entitled to get the additional increment. Therefore, for the period prior to 04.09.2018, the District Awardees were entitled to get the additional increment and, therefore, no error has been committed by the High Court in directing the benefit of additional increment to the District Awardees for the period prior to 04.09.2018.

We are in complete agreement with the view taken by the High Court.

The Special Leave Petition stands dismissed. Pending applications stand disposed of.

(R. NATARAJAN) (NISHA TRIPATHI) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS BRANCH OFFICER