Sujatha V vs. State Of Karnataka
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
First Hearing
Listed On:
23 Apr 2025
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
COURT NO.14
SECTION IV-A
ITEM NO.48
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No(s). 16892/2025
[Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 18-02-2025 in WP No.33829/2024 and WP No.33848/2024 passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru]
SUJATHA V. & ORS.
Petitioners
VERSUS
STATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS.
Respondents
[With I.A. No.100918/2025-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and I.A. No.100917/2025-PERMISSION TO FILE PFTTTTON (SLP/TP/WP/..)]
Date: 23-04-2025 This matter was called on for hearing today.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPANKAR DATTA CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN
| For Petitioner(s): Mr. Prashanth R. Dixit, Adv. | |
|---|---|
| Mr. Thashmitha Muthanna, Adv. | |
| Mr. Devasa & Co., AOR |
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Abhishek Kumar Singh, AOR
Mr. Shailesh Madiyal, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mahesh Thakur, AOR Mrs. Geetanjali Bedi, Adv. Ms. Diviia Mahaian, Adv. Mr. Anchit Singla, Adv.
Mr. Gaurav Agarwal, Sr. Adv. Mr. Nikhil Rohatgi, Adv. Mr. B. Shravanth Shanker, AOR Ms. Grahita Agarwal, Adv. Mr. B. Yeshwanth Raj, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following $0 R D E R$
Permission to file special leave petition is granted.
The order impugned in this special leave petition is an ad-interim order $\mathcal{L}$
passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru staying operation of an order of transfer dated 10th December, 2024, till the next date of hearing.
-
We are informed that the writ petition is due to be listed tomorrow, i.e., 24th April, 2025, for final hearing.
-
In such view of the matter, we request the roster Bench to proceed with the hearing of the writ petition.
-
It is needless to observe that the interim order that is under challenge here shall abide by the result of the writ petition.
-
Re-list the special leave petition after one week.
-
Since the petitioners are not party to the proceedings before the High Court, they shall be permitted to intervene and advance arguments.
(RASHMI DHYANI PANT) (SUDHIR KUMAR SHARMA) ASST. REGISTRAR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER (NSH)