Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Ltd vs. Jaspreet Dhingra
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
FRESH
Before:
Hon'ble Ahsanuddin Amanullah, Hon'ble Prashant Kumar Mishra
Stage:
FRESH (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES
Remarks:
Disposed off
Listed On:
15 Apr 2025
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Interlocutory Applications:
87480/2025,87482/2025
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
COURT NO.17
SECTION XIV
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).9843/2025
[Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 17-02-2025 in WP(C) No.1810/2025 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhil
DELHI METRO RAIL CORPORATION LTD. & ORS. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
JASPREET DHINGRA & ORS.
Respondent $(s)$
(IA No. 87480/2025 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT IA No. 87482/2025 - PERMISSION TO PLACE ADDITIONAL FACTS AND GROUNDS)
Date: 15-04-2025 This matter was called on for hearing today.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA
For Petitioner(s) Mr. P. S. Patwalia, Sr. Adv. Mr. Shashank Kumar Vemulakonda, AOR Mr. V. S. R. Krishna, Adv. Mr. V. Shashank Kumar, Adv.
For Respondent(s)
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
In the facts and circumstances of the present case, we are not inclined to interfere with the matter and even after looking at the ature Not Verified with the end result would that the end result would be the same i.e., the respondents/original applicants have made out a case for their appointment on the post in question. The other
question with regard to retrospectivity is also noted to be rejected on the principle that for no fault, the concerned respondents have suffered and their entitlement to consequential benefits from the date any person appointed on the post pursuant to the same exercise is reiterated. However, we make it clear that the observations made in paragraphs no.36 and 41 of the impugned judgment with regard to course of action to be adopted in future transactions is concerned, the same shall not be binding on the petitioners and would depend on the facts and circumstances of the case as it emerges in future.
2. With aforesaid observation, the petition stands disposed of. 3. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)
(SAPNA BISHT) (ANJALI PANWAR)