Poulomi Pavini Shukla vs. Union Of India
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Fixed Date by Court
Stage:
SERVICE/COMPLIANCE-BEFORE REGISTRAR(J)
Remarks:
List On (Date) [08-04-2019]
Listed On:
25 Feb 2019
In:
Registrar
Category:
UNKNOWN
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
BEFORE THE REGISTRAR ANIL LAXMAN PANSARE
Writ Petition(s) (Civil) No(s). 503/2018
POULOMI PAVINI SHUKLA
Petitioner(s)
$Respondent(s)$
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
Date: 25-02-2019 This petition was called on for hearing today.
For Petitioner(s)
Petitioner-in-person
For Respondent(s)
Ms. Aprajita Mukherjee, Adv. Mr. Upendra Mishra, Adv. Mr. Ranjan Mukherjee, AOR Mr. Sanveer Mehlwal, Adv. Mr. Raju Sonkar, Adv. Ms. Geetanjali Mehlwal, Adv. Dr. Ravindra Chingale, Adv. Ms. Kamakshi S. Mehlwal, AOR Ms. Rachna Gandhi, Adv. Ms. Rachana Srivastava, AOR Ms. Hemantika Wahi, AOR Ms. G. Indira, AOR Mr. V. G. Pragasam, AOR Ms. K. Enatoli Sema, AOR Ms. Ruchira Gupta, Adv. Mr. Anurag Sharma, Adv. Mr. Shishir Deshpande, AOR Ms. Aruna Mathur, AOR Ms. Anuradha Arputham, Adv. M/S. Arputham Aruna And Co, AOR Mr. A. Tewari, Adv. Ms. Eliza Bar, Adv. Mr. Shree Pal Singh, AOR Mr. Seshatalpa Sai Bandaru, Adv. Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar, AOR Mr. Aniruddha P. Mayee, AOR Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen, AOR Mr. S.. Udaya Kumar Sagar, AOR
Ms. Dimple Nagpal, Adv. M/S. Plr Chambers And Co., AOR Mr. Mojahid Karim Khan, Adv. Mr. M. Shoeb Alam, AOR Ms. Monisha Suri, Adv. Mr. Chirag M. Shroff, AOR Mr. Abhinav Mukerji, AOR Mr. Kabir Shankar Bose, Adv. Mr. Rijuk Sarkar, Adv. Mr. Shuvodeep Roy, AOR Mr. Vibhu Shanker Mishra, Adv. Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, AOR Mr. Kumar Milind, Adv. Mr. Ashok Kumar, Adv. Mr. Gopal Singh, AOR Mr. Mohit Yadav, Adv. Mr. Raju Sonkar, Adv. Mr. K.S. Mehlwal, AOR Ms. Parul Luthra, Adv. Ms. Hemantika Wahi, AOR Mr. Parikshit P. Angadi, Adv. Mr. Manendra Pal Gupta, Adv. Mr. V.N. Raghupathy, AOR Mr. Shekhar Raj Sharma, Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen, AOR Mrs. K. Enatoli Sema, AOR Mr. Amit Kumar Singh, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
Ld. Counsel for respondent No.8 submitted that vakalatnama has been filed but copy of complete set of pleadings has not been served upon him. Petitioner submitted that she will serve the complete set of pleadings today itself alongwith proof of service of pleadings. Four weeks' time is granted to respondent No.8 for filing counter affidavit.
Respondent Nos.6, 10, 12, 13, 24 and 29 have already filed counter affidavit.
Respondent Nos.19, 30 and 35 have filed counter affidavit but after the opportunity was declined. Registry to make a
specific mention in the office report at the time of listing the matter before the Hon'ble Court.
Respondent No.19 has filed counter affidavit with the permission of the Hon'ble Court.
Four weeks' time is granted to respondent No.1 for filing counter affidavit.
Last opportunity is granted to respondent Nos.9, 11, 21, 23, 27, 32, 33, 34, 39 and 40 for filing counter affidavit within four weeks.
Ld. Counsels appearing for the served respondents for the first time are granted four weeks' time for filing counter affidavit.
Ld. Counsels who are already appearing for the served respondents are granted four weeks' time, as last opportunity, for filing counter affidavit.
Ld. Counsel for the served respondents who were given last opportunity for filing counter affidavit and have not filed counter affidavit, their further opportunity stands declined.
Remaining respondents have been served but none has entered appearance.
List again on 8.4.2019.