REGISTRAR COURT. 2

SECTION TVB

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 19667/2015 RAJNISH KUMAR AND ORS.

VERSUS

STATE PUNJAB AND ORS.

<pre>(with office report)</pre>

WITH

SLP(C) No. $21135/2015$ (With appln.(s) for c/delay in refiling SLP and Interim Relief and Office Report)

$SLP(C)$ No. 22628/2015 (With Office Report)

SLP(C) No. 20999/2015 (With Interim Relief and Office Report)

$SLP(C)$ No. 347/2016 (With Office Report)

$SLP(C)$ No. 5474/2016 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing $c/c$ of the impugned order and Office Report)

Date : $10/03/2016$ These petitions were called on for hearing today.

For Petitioner(s)

Mr. Arun K. Sinha, Adv.

Mr. Arun Singh, Adv. Mr. Shankar Divate, Adv.

Mr. Praveen Agrawal, Adv. Ms. Amita Singh Kalkal, Adv. Petitioner(s)

Respondent(s)

For Respondent(s) Ms. Shubhangi Tuli,Adv. Mr. Anant K. Vatsya,Adv. Mr. Kuldip Singh,Adv. Mr. Satinder S. Gulati,Adv. Mr. Kamaldeep Gulati,Adv. Mr. B. Subrahmanya Prasad,Adv. Mr. Satish Kumar,Adv. Mr. Abhishek Atrey,Adv. Mr. Sudhir Walia,Adv. Ms. Pragya Wazir,Adv. Mr. Rohit Sharma,Adv. Mr. Rounak Nayak,Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

SLP(C) No. 19667/2015

The office report indicates that service of notice is complete on the respondent Nos. 1 to 3 but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. Ld. Counsel for the respondent Nos. 4 to 18 have failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules. Viewed, in that context, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court, under the rules.

SLP(C) No. 21135/2015

Mr. O.P. Bhadani, Ld. Counsel has appeared on behalf of Respondent No. 24. He has stated that he has already filed the vakalatnama. Office shall verify the position.

The office report indicates that although by order dated 27.1.2016 of this Court four weeks time as last chance was given to the Learned Counsel for the petitioner to comply with the terms of the order in respect of the unserved respondents, yet he has not done the needful within the period stipulated in the order. Viewed in that context, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further future directions. Await orders. List thereafter.

SLP(C) No. 22628/2015

Mr. O.P. Bhadani, Ld. Counsel has appeared on behalf of Respondent No. 9. He has stated that he has already filed the vakalatnama. Office shall verify the position.

The office report indicates that although by order dated 27.1.2016 of this Court four weeks time as last chance was given to the Learned Counsel for the petitioner to comply with the terms of the order in respect of the unserved respondents, yet he has not done the needful within the period stipulated in the order. Viewed in that context, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further future directions. Await orders. List thereafter.

SLP(C) No. 20999/2015

Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 have already filed the counter affidavit.

The office report indicates that although by order dated 27.1.2016 of this Court four weeks time as last chance was given to the Learned Counsel for the petitioner to comply with the terms of the order in respect of the respondent Nos. 4 and 5, yet he has not done the needful within the period stipulated in the order. Viewed in that context, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further future directions. Await orders. List thereafter.

SLP(C) Nos. 347 and 5747/2016

Await the return of the service of notice already issued to all the respondents.

List again on 28.4.2016.

(M V RAMESH) Registrar

MG