Shewalkar Developers Ltd. Through Its Managing Director Shri Ashutosh Ram Shewalkar vs. The State Of Maharashtra And Ors. Etc. Etc
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
First Hearing
Listed On:
6 Sept 2017
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IX
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. SANJAY PARIHAR
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 33209-33210/2016
M/S SHEWALKAR DEVELOPERS LTD. THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR SHRI ASHUTOSH RAM SHEWALKAR COMMON IN ALL Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT THROUGH ITS SECRETARY & ORS. Respondent(s)
WITH
Signature Not Verified
SLP(C) No. 38454/2016 (IX)
Date : 06-09-2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today.
For Petitioner(s) | Mr. Siddhesh Kotwal,Adv. | |
---|---|---|
Ms. Shreya Bhatnagar,Adv. | ||
Mr. Raghunatha Sethupathy,Adv. | ||
Mr. Nirnimesh Dube, AOR | ||
Ms. Manju Jetley, AOR | ||
For Respondent(s) | Mr. Rajeev B. ,Adv. | |
Mr. S. R. Setia, AOR | ||
M/s. Lambat And Associates, AOR | ||
Mr. Somanatha Padhan, AOR | ||
Mr. Seshatalpa Sai Bandaru,Adv. | ||
Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar, AOR | ||
Mr. Anagha S. Desai, AOR |
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
SLP(C) Nos. 33209-33210/2016
Ld. Counsel for the respondent Nos. 2, 3 and 5 to 9 have failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules. Digitally signed by MADHU GROVER Date: 2017.09.07 14:07:26 IST Reason:
Service of notice is complete on respondent Nos. 1 and 10 to
Item No.29 2
12 but no one has entered appearance on their behalf.
However, Mr. Seshatalpa Sai Bandaru, Ld. Advocate has appeared on behalf of the respondent No.1. He seeks and is given four weeks time to file the vakalatnama and the counter affidavit.
Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to the respondent Nos. 4 and 13 shall be taken by the learned counsel for the petitioner within a period of two weeks. Dasti in addition is permitted to be served.
SLP(C) No. 38454/2016
Service of notice is complete on respondent Nos. 1 and 2 but no one has entered appearance on their behalf.
However, Mr. Seshatalpa Sai Bandaru, Ld. Advocate has appeared on behalf of the respondent No.1. He seeks and is given four weeks time to file the vakalatnama and the counter affidavit.
Four weeks time is given to the respondent No.3 to file the counter affidavit.
List again on 1.11.2017.
SANJAY PARIHAR Registrar
MG