Shewalkar Developers Ltd. Through Its Managing Director Shri Ashutosh Ram Shewalkar vs. The State Of Maharashtra And Ors. Etc. Etc

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Registrar (J) - Iv
Case Status:Pending
Order Date:6 Sept 2017
CNR:SCIN010168352016

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

First Hearing

Listed On:

6 Sept 2017

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IX

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. SANJAY PARIHAR

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 33209-33210/2016

M/S SHEWALKAR DEVELOPERS LTD. THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR SHRI ASHUTOSH RAM SHEWALKAR COMMON IN ALL Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT THROUGH ITS SECRETARY & ORS. Respondent(s)

WITH

Signature Not Verified

SLP(C) No. 38454/2016 (IX)

Date : 06-09-2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today.

For Petitioner(s)Mr. Siddhesh Kotwal,Adv.
Ms. Shreya Bhatnagar,Adv.
Mr. Raghunatha Sethupathy,Adv.
Mr. Nirnimesh Dube, AOR
Ms. Manju Jetley, AOR
For Respondent(s)Mr. Rajeev B. ,Adv.
Mr. S. R. Setia, AOR
M/s. Lambat And Associates, AOR
Mr. Somanatha Padhan, AOR
Mr. Seshatalpa Sai Bandaru,Adv.
Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar, AOR
Mr. Anagha S. Desai, AOR

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

SLP(C) Nos. 33209-33210/2016

Ld. Counsel for the respondent Nos. 2, 3 and 5 to 9 have failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules. Digitally signed by MADHU GROVER Date: 2017.09.07 14:07:26 IST Reason:

Service of notice is complete on respondent Nos. 1 and 10 to

Item No.29 2

12 but no one has entered appearance on their behalf.

However, Mr. Seshatalpa Sai Bandaru, Ld. Advocate has appeared on behalf of the respondent No.1. He seeks and is given four weeks time to file the vakalatnama and the counter affidavit.

Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to the respondent Nos. 4 and 13 shall be taken by the learned counsel for the petitioner within a period of two weeks. Dasti in addition is permitted to be served.

SLP(C) No. 38454/2016

Service of notice is complete on respondent Nos. 1 and 2 but no one has entered appearance on their behalf.

However, Mr. Seshatalpa Sai Bandaru, Ld. Advocate has appeared on behalf of the respondent No.1. He seeks and is given four weeks time to file the vakalatnama and the counter affidavit.

Four weeks time is given to the respondent No.3 to file the counter affidavit.

List again on 1.11.2017.

SANJAY PARIHAR Registrar

MG

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(62) - 7 May 2025

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(61) - 28 Feb 2025

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(60) - 6 Jan 2025

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(59) - 7 Nov 2024

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(58) - 30 Sept 2024

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(57) - 12 Feb 2024

ROP

Click to view

Order(56) - 19 Aug 2021

ROP

Click to view

Order(55) - 7 Apr 2021

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(54) - 25 Mar 2021

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(53) - 27 Nov 2020

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(52) - 29 Oct 2020

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(51) - 22 Jul 2020

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(50) - 3 Mar 2020

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(49) - 11 Feb 2020

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(48) - 4 Dec 2019

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(47) - 19 Nov 2019

ROP

Click to view

Order(46) - 3 Oct 2019

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(45) - 17 Sept 2019

ROP

Click to view

Order(44) - 30 Apr 2019

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(43) - 1 Apr 2019

ROP

Click to view

Order(42) - 11 Mar 2019

ROP

Click to view

Order(41) - 15 Feb 2019

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(40) - 12 Oct 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(39) - 11 Sept 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(38) - 4 Sept 2018

ROP

Click to view

Order(37) - 10 Aug 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(36) - 11 May 2018

ROP

Click to view

Order(35) - 23 Apr 2018

ROP

Click to view

Order(34) - 13 Apr 2018

ROP

Click to view

Order(32) - 16 Mar 2018

ROP

Click to view

Order(33) - 16 Mar 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(30) - 22 Feb 2018

ROP

Click to view

Order(31) - 22 Feb 2018

ROP

Click to view

Order(29) - 19 Feb 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(28) - 13 Feb 2018

ROP

Click to view

Order(27) - 12 Feb 2018

ROP

Click to view

Order(26) - 19 Jan 2018

ROP

Click to view

Order(25) - 5 Jan 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(24) - 8 Nov 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(23) - 6 Sept 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Viewing

Order(21) - 24 Apr 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(22) - 24 Apr 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(19) - 8 Mar 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(20) - 8 Mar 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(17) - 30 Jan 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(18) - 30 Jan 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(14) - 5 Jan 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(15) - 5 Jan 2017

Office Report

Click to view

Order(16) - 5 Jan 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(11) - 2 Jan 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(12) - 2 Jan 2017

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(13) - 2 Jan 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(8) - 7 Nov 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(9) - 7 Nov 2016

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(10) - 7 Nov 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(6) - 19 Sept 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(7) - 19 Sept 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(4) - 5 Sept 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(5) - 5 Sept 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(1) - 12 Aug 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(2) - 12 Aug 2016

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(3) - 12 Aug 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view
Similar Case Search

Same Parties

Search in District Courts Data