Hanumant Bhagwat Rakusale vs. The State Of Maharashtra
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Not Reached / Adjourned
Before:
Hon'ble Hon'Ble The Chief Justice, Hon'ble K.V. Viswanathan
Stage:
AFTER NOTICE (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES
Remarks:
Disposed off [Infructuous]
Listed On:
12 Apr 2024
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Interlocutory Applications:
90673/2021,90674/2021,90675/2021,108717/2021,110167/2021,
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.19 COURT NO.2 SECTION IX
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 12821- 12825/2021
[Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 22-04-2021 in WPST No. 97384/2020 21-05-2021 in WP No. 12319/2019 15-06-2021 in WP No. 12319/2019 06-07-2021 in WP No. 2438/2021 15-07-2021 in WP No. 2438/2021 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay]
HANUMANT BHAGWAT RAKUSALE & ORS. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. Respondent(s)
(IA No. 110167/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT, IA No. 108717/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT, IA No. 90674/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT, IA No. 90673/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 90675/2021 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES
Date : 04-12-2024 This matter was called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.R. GAVAI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.V. VISWANATHAN
For Petitioner(s) :
Mr. Anand Dilip Landge, AOR Mrs. Sangeeta S Pahune Patil, Adv. Ms. Revati P. Kharde, Adv. Mr. Sumit Kumar, Adv.
For Respondent(s) :
Digitally signed by DEEPAK SINGH Date: 2025.02.17 18:05:51 IST Reason: Signature Not Verified
Mr. Sudhanshu S. Chaudhari, Sr. Adv. Mr. Somiran Sharma, AOR Mr. Pranjal Chapalgaonkar, Adv. Mr. Sandeep Dere, Adv. Mr. Aniruddha Joshi, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Siddharth Dharmadhikari, Adv.
Mr. Aaditya Aniruddha Pande, AOR
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
1. Since the special leave petition arises out of an interlocutory order and we are informed by learned counsel for the respondents that the writ petitions themselves stand disposed of, the present special leave petitions are disposed of.
2. However, we clarify that if the present petitioners has any subsisting grievance, they would be at liberty to take such steps as may be permissible in law and the disposal of the writ petition in the present matter(s) would not come in their way.
3. Since we have not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter, all contentions available to the parties are left open.
4. Pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of.
(DEEPAK SINGH) (ANJU KAPOOR) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS COURT MASTER (NSH)