Prince vs. Deputy Director Of Consolidation
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) $No(s).9713/2020$
$\mathbf{1}$
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19-02-2020 in WB No. 6333/1996 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad)
PRINCE & ORS.
Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION & ORS. Respondent(s)
(WITH IA No. 129621/2020 - APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS)
WITH SLP(C) No. 14562/2020 (XI) (WITH I.R. and IA No.123647/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.123648/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.)
Date: 11-02-2021 These matters were called on for hearing today.
CORAM:
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH
| For Petitioner(s) | Mr. Rakesh Khanna, Sr. Adv.<br>Mr. Kaushal Yadav, AOR<br>Mr. Nandlal Kumar Mishra, Adv.<br>Mr. Sandeep Mishra, Adv.<br>Dr. Ajay Kumar, Adv.<br>Mr. Shafik Ahmed, Adv.<br>Ms. Shweta Yadav, Adv.<br>Ms. Kritiya Pandey Adv<br>Ms. Yashoda Katiyar Adv<br>Ms. Akansha Rai Adv<br>Ms. Apeksha Rai Adv |
|---|---|
| Signature Not Verified<br>Digitally signed by<br>Sanjay Kumar<br>Date: $202402.12$<br>15:23:52 IS<br>Reason:<br>For Respondent(s) | Mr. Nagendra Singh, Adv.<br>Ms. Akansha, Adv.<br>Dr. Sanjay Gupta, Adv.<br>Mr. Kapil Chandana, Adv.<br>Ms Nandita Jha, Adv.<br>Mr. Ronak Karanpuria, AOR<br>Mr. Abhimanyu Bhandari, Adv.<br>Mr. Umesh Bhati, Adv.<br>Ms. Roohe Hina Dua, AOR<br>Mr. Cheitanya Madan, Adv. |
Mr. Abhinav Jain, Adv. Mr. Rajeev Singh, AOR Mr. Nagendra Singh, Adv. Ms. Akansha, Adv. Dr. Sanjay Gupta, Adv. Mr. Kapil Chandana, Adv. Ms Nandita Jha, Adv. Mr. Ronak Karanpuria, AOR
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
- 1 Mr Rakesh Khanna, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, has stated, on instructions, that Respondent Nos 10,13 and 29 have died.
- 2 Mr Abhinav Jain, learned counsel, states that he has received instructions to appear on behalf of the legal representatives of deceased Respondent Nos 10, 13 and 29.
- 3 Since Mr Abhinav Jain has instructions to appear on behalf of the legal representatives of deceased Respondent Nos 10, 13 and 29, substitution is allowed.
- 4 We are not inclined to entertain the Special Leave Petitions under Article 136 of the Constitution.
- 3 The Special Leave Petitions are accordingly dismissed.
- 4 Pending applications stand disposed of.
(SANJAY KUMAR-I) (SAROJ KUMARI GAUR) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER
2