The State Of Bihar Chief Secretary vs. Bihar Distillers And Bottlers Pvt Ltd Director
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
First Hearing
Listed On:
14 Jul 2017
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
TTEM NO. $41$
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Nos.16828-16831/2017
COURT NO.2
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 03-05-2017 in CWP No. 1713/2017 03-05-2017 in CWP No. 1623/2017 03-05-2017 in CWP No. 1629/2017 03-05-2017 in CWP No. 1737/2017 03-05-2017 in CWJC No. 1713/2017 03-05-2017 in CWJC No. 1623/2017 03-05-2017 in CWJC No. 1629/2017 03-05-2017 in CWJC No. 1737/2017 passed by the High Court of Patna)
THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS.
Petitioner(s)
SECTION XVI
VERSUS
BIHAR DISTILLERS AND BOTTLERS PVT LTD & ORS. $Respondent(s)$
(With appln.(s) for interim relief and exemption from filing O.T.)
Date: 14-07-2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today.
$CORAM :$
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPAK MISRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR
- For Petitioner(s) Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Gopal Subramonium, Sr. Adv. Mr. Shyam Divan, Sr. Adv. Mr. Keshav Mohan, Adv. Mr. Smarhar Singh, AOR Mr. Piyush Choudhary, Adv.
- Mr. Neeraj Kishan Kaul, Sr. Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Yashraj Singh Deora, AOR Ms. Ragya Vaidehy Singh, Adv. Ms. Sanjana Saddy, Adv. Mr. Sanyat Lodha, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following ORDER
Heard Mr. Mukul Rohatqi and Mr. Gopal Subramoniam, learned senior counsel along with Mr. Keshav Mohan, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Neeraj Kishan Kaul, learned senior counsel along with Mr. Yashraj Singh Deora, learned counsel for the respondents.
Issue notice.
Learned counsel for the respondents undertake to file the counter affidavit within six weeks hence. Rejoinder affidavit, if any, be filed within four weeks therefrom.
List the matter after ten weeks.
In the meantime, as undertaken by the learned counsel for the respondents, they shall neither manufacture the potable alcohol, nor convert the industrial alcohol to potable alcohol. Additionally, they will not submit any application for renewal of potable alcohol. When we say that the respondents shall not apply for renewal of potable alcohol, that does not debar them to apply for renewal of licence for industrial alcohol.
(Chetan Kumar) (H.S. Parasher) Court Master Court Master