The Haryana Urban Development Authority Panchkula (Now Known As Haryana Shehri Vikas Pradhikaran) vs. Rajeshwari Devi Laxmi Devi

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Registrar (A-J)
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:20 Oct 2023
CNR:SCIN010166672020

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Mention Memo

Before:

Hon'ble Surya Kant, Hon'ble Dipankar Datta

Stage:

AFTER NOTICE (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES

Remarks:

Stay/Status quo, List On (Date) [08-01-2024]

Listed On:

20 Oct 2023

In:

Judge

Category:

UNKNOWN

Interlocutory Applications:

82447/2020,

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

COURT NO.5

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL)...................................

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 30-07-2019 in RSA No.692/2014 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh)

THE HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (NOW KNOWN AS HARYANA SHEHRI VIKAS PRADHIKARAN) $&$ ANR.

Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

SUDHA SINGHAL & ORS.

Respondent $(s)$

(IA NO.80958/2020 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING)

WITH Diary No(s). 16653/2020 (IV-B) (IA No. 79963/2020 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING)

Diary No(s). 16657/2020 (IV-B) (IA No. 79896/2020 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING)

Diary No(s). 16658/2020 (IV-B) (IA No. 80062/2020 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING)

Diary No(s). 16662/2020 (IV-B) (IA No. 80564/2020 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING)

Diary No(s). 16664/2020 (IV-B) (IA No. 80208/2020 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING)

Diary No(s). 16667/2020 (IV-B) (IA No. 82447/2020 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING)

Diarv No(s). 16671/2020 (IV-B) (IA No. 79997/2020 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING)

Diary No(s). 19838/2020 (IV-B) (IA No. 95887/2020 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING)

Date: 20-10-2023 These matters were called on for hearing today.

Signa DenoRAIM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPANKAR DATTA Sigitally signer $\sim$ , $\sqrt{RJUN}$ BISM<br> $\sim$ 2022 10.20 16:32:53 $\overline{IS}$ <br>Reason: For Petitioner(s) Mr. Lokesh Sinhal, Sr. A.A.G. Mr. Samar Vijay Singh, Adv.

$\mathbf{1}$

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen, AOR Ms. Himani Bhatnagar, Adv. Mr. Lokesh Sinhal, Sr. A.A.G. Mr. Akshay Amritanshu, AOR Mr. Ashutosh Jain, Adv. Mr. Samyak Jain, Adv. Mr. Nikunj Gupta, Adv. Ms. Himanshi Shakya, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Sachin Jain, Adv. Ms. Amrita Rai, Adv. Mr. Rajiv Ranjan Dwivedi, AOR Mr. Ajay Kumar, Adv. Mr. Priya Ranjan Roi, Adv. Mr. Manoj Swarup, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ankit Swarup, AOR Mr. Neelmani Pant, Adv. Ms. Apoorva Singh, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

1. Learned Senior Additional Advocate General for the State of Haryana, on instructions, states that pursuant to the order dated 08.10.2020, the Haryana Urban Development Authority (HSVP) has been able to carve out some plots in Sector 13, Kurukshetra for allotment to the oustees. He states that the advertisement is likely to be issued within two weeks.

2. The respondents may apply in response to such advertisement.

3. Post the matters for hearing on 08.01.2024.

4. Meanwhile, the execution proceedings shall remain stayed.

(ARJUN BISHT) (PREETHI T.C.)

COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)

2