Sri Madan Mohan Tripathi And Anr. Etc vs. The State Of Bihar
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
After Week/Month/Vacation
Before:
Hon'ble K.M. Joseph, Hon'ble Hrishikesh Roy
Stage:
AFTER NOTICE (FOR ADMISSION) - CRIMINAL CASES
Remarks:
Dismissed
Listed On:
22 Sept 2022
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Interlocutory Applications:
177413/2018,
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.6 COURT NO.6 SECTION II-A
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) Nos. 837-838/2019
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 16-01-2017 in CRLMN No. 35456/2013 16-01-2017 in CRLMN No. 35270/2013 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Patna)
SRI MADAN MOHAN TRIPATHI AND ANR. ETC. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR. Respondent(s)
(With IA No. 177413/2018 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.)
Date : 22-09-2022 These matters were called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
Digitally signed by SNEHA
18:37:06 IST Reason:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.M. JOSEPH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY
For Petitioner(s)
Mr. Neeraj Shekhar, AOR Mr. Ashutosh Thakur, Adv. Dr. Sumit Kumar, Adv. Ms. Mrigna Shekhar, Adv. Ms. Ayushi Singh, Adv.
For Respondent(s)
Mr. Saket Singh, Adv. Ms. Sangeeta Singh, Adv. Mrs. Niranjana Singh, AOR
Mr. Dinesh Chandra Pandey, AOR
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
We have noticed that the High Court has left it open to the petitioners to raise their grievances at the time of framing of charge or at an appropriate stage. Signature Not Verified
After hearing learned counsel for the parties, we do not think that the petitioners have made out any case for Date: 2022.09.30
interference with the impugned order under Article 136 of the Constitution of India. The special leave petitions are dismissed. Pending application stands disposed of.
We further make it clear that if the petitioners make an appropriate application before the Court seeking exemption it will be considered as per law.
It is submitted by the petitioners that the petitioners are aged parents-in-law of the second respondent-complainant and the petitioners have impaired mobility. We are certain that the Court will bestow adequate attention to this aspect while it considers the application seeking exemption.
(NIDHI AHUJA) (RENU KAPOOR) AR-cum-PS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR