New Okhla Industrial Development Authority vs. Rameshwar @ Ramesh Chandra Sharma (Dead) Through Legal Heir
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
11 Nov 2022
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.18 COURT NO.5 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No(s). 16653/2022
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 18-12-2018 in FAD No. 349/2015 18-12-2018 in FA No. 657/2017 18-12-2018 in FAD No. 68/2001 18-12-2018 in FAD No. 206/2001 18-12-2018 in FAD No. 339/2015 18-12-2018 in FAD No. 345/2015 18-12-2018 in FAD No. 396/2015 18-12-2018 in FAD No. 397/2015 18-12-2018 in FAD No. 179/2016 07-09-2017 in FAD No. 345/2015 07-09-2017 in FAD No. 349/2015 07-09-2017 in FAD No. 397/2015 07-09-2017 in FAD No. 103/2006 09-12-2021 in FA No. 104/2019 07-09-2017 in FAD No. 396/2015 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad)
NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
RAMESHWAR @ RAMESH CHANDRA SHARMA (DEAD) THROUGH LEGAL HEIR & ANR. Respondent(s)
(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.127969/2022-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.127972/2022-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.127973/2022-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IA No.127970/2022-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING / CURING THE DEFECTS)
Date : 11-11-2022 These petitions were called on for hearing today.
- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. SUNDRESH
- For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sourav Roy, AOR Mr. Kaushal Sharma, Adv. Mr. Prabudh Singh, Adv.
- For Respondent(s) Mr. Sanjay Mani Tripathi, Adv. Mr. Raj Narayan Tewari, Adv. Mr. Kamal Kant Tewari, Adv. Mr. Suraj Singh, Adv. Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, AOR
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Digitally signed by R Signature Not Verified
Issue notice.
Natarajan Date: 2022.11.11 16:54:11 IST Reason:
Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, learned AOR, who is on caveat, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.
We have heard Mr. Sourav Roy, learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the petitioner(s) and Mr. Sanjay Mani Tripathi, learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the respondent(s).
Leave granted. Arguments concluded. Order reserved.
(R. NATARAJAN) (NISHA TRIPATHI) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR