Mohansinh Laxmamsinh Solanki vs. Union Of India Ministry Of Home Affairs Secretary
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
24 Feb 2006
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.102 COURT NO.11 SECTION IX (Mentioned) S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 1479 OF 2006 DIVYAGNAKUMARI HARISINH PARMAR & ORS. Appellant (s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln(s) for PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHY LIST OF DATES) WITH Civil Appeal NO. 1480 of 2006 (With appln(s) for substitution, c/delay in filing substitution and office report) Civil Appeal NO. 1481 of 2006 Civil Appeal NO. 1482 of 2006 Civil Appeal NO. 1483 of 2006 Civil Appeal NO. 1484 of 2006 (With office report) Civil Appeal NO. 1485 of 2006 Civil Appeal NO. 1486 of 2006 Civil Appeal NO. 1487 of 2006 (With appln(s) for substitution, c/delay in filing subst. appln) Civil Appeal NO. 1488 of 2006 Civil Appeal NO. 1489 of 2006 (With appln(s) for substitution, c/delay in filing subst. appln) SLP(C) NO. 1866 of 2012 (With appln(s) for exemption from filing c/c, c/delay in filing SLP, c/delay in refiling SLP and office report) Date: 21/08/2013 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE GYAN SUDHA MISRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE For Appellant(s) Mr. Shivaji M. Jadhav,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. D.S. Mahra,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R It is stated by the learned counsel for the appellants that some of the appellants have expired and an application for substitution is required to be filed. Let these matters be listed after six weeks for doing the needful.
¤
(NAVEEN KUMAR) (S.S.R. KRISHNA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER
Note: No appearance slip was given in the Court.