Acharya N. G. Ranga Agric. University vs. R. Bener Raj & Ors. Etc
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Fixed Date by Court
Stage:
SERVICE/COMPLIANCE-BEFORE REGISTRAR(J)
Remarks:
List Before Chamber
Listed On:
20 Jan 2020
In:
Registrar
Category:
UNKNOWN
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. ANIL LAXMAN PANSARE
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) $No(s)$ . 20827-20829/2012
ACHARYA N.G.RANGA AGRIC.UNIVERSITY
Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
R.BENER RAJ & ORS.ETC.
(ONLY SLP NOS. 20827-20829 OF 2012 AND SLP NO. 34681 OF 2014 TO BE LISTED. )
WITH
$SLP(C)$ No. 34681/2014 (XII-A) ( FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 1/2014 IA No. $1/2014$ - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING)
Date: 20-01-2020 These petitions were called on for hearing today.
For Petitioner(s)
Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, AOR
$\n \mathbb{Res}_{\text{Pos}}(s)\n$ Mr. Aditya Singh, AOR Mr Bharat J Joshi, Adv.
Mr. G. Ramakrishna Prasad, AOR
$Respondent(s)$
Mr. Vishnu Shankar Jain, AOR
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
SLP(C) No.20827-20829/2012
None appeared for the petitioner when called.
None appeared for respondent no.1 in SLP(C) No.20829/2012 when called. The record shows that vakalatnama has been filed on 20.4.2018 however, counter affidavit has not been filed till today. There is neither written application for extension of time to file pleadings in terms of Order V Rule 1(22), Supreme Court Rules, 2013 nor is there oral request to that effect. It appears that the respondent is not interested in filing counter affidavit and, therefore, opportunity to file counter affidavit stands declined.
-2-
Item No.4
Service is complete on rest of the respondents.
Duly represented respondents have already filed counter affidavit.
SLP(C) No. 34681/2014
Service is complete on respondent no.1 but none has entered appearance. Letter sent by respondent no.1 be processed as per rules.
Ld. Counsel for the petitioner has not taken fresh steps alongwith complete address to effect service on respondent no.2.
Ld. Counsel for the petitioner has not taken fresh steps alongwith complete address in respect of respondent no.9 in SLP(C) No.20827/2012,respondent nos.5 & 6 in SLP(C) No.20829/2012 and respondent no.2 in SLP(C) No. 34681/2014, as such, registry to process the matters for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chamber for orders.
ANIL LAXMAN PANSARE
Registrar