Rajiv Kumar Mishra vs. State Of U. P. Through Chief Secretary

&ITEM NO.3 COURT NO.10 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A.NO.7 IN CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 4766 OF 2010 RAJIV KUMAR MISHRA Appellant (s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln(s) for intervention) Date: 07/09/2011 This Appeal was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.M. PANCHAL (IN CHAMBERS) For Appellant(s) Ms. Tulika Prakash,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. T. N. Singh, Adv. Mr. Rajeev Dubey, Adv. Mr. Kamlendra Mishra, Adv. Mr. Ravi Prakash Mehrotra,Adv. Mr. Mukesh Verma, Adv. Mr. Pradeep Misra ,Adv Mr. Suraj Singh, Adv. Mr. M. A. Chinnasamy, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The learned counsel for the State of U.P. Mr. Kamlendra Mishra states at the Bar that the copy of I.A. No.7/2011 is not served on the respondents nor the appearance of the learned Advocate is shown in the cause list. Under the circumstances, the petitioner is directed to serve copy of the I.A. upon the respondents. The registry is directed to show the appearance of learned Advocate appearing for the respondent. List the matter after two weeks. (Neetu Sachdeva) (Sharda Kapoor) Sr. P. A. Court Master