Vineet Dhanda vs. Union Of India Ministry Of Home Affairs Secretary
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
28 May 2015
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ì ITEM NO.50 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION PIL(W)
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWAL
Writ Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 317/2015
VINEET DHANDA Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for permission to file lengthy list of dates)
Date : 24/08/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.
For Petitioner(s)
Dr. J. P. Dhanda,Adv.
For Respondent(s)
Mr. | Abhisth Kumar,Adv. | |
---|---|---|
Mr. | Aniruddha P. Mayee,Adv. | |
Mr. | Sapam Biswajit Meitei, Adv. | |
Mr. | Z.H. Issac Haiding, Adv. | |
Mr. | Ashok Kumar Singh,Adv. | |
Mr. | B. Balaji,Adv. | |
Mr. | Sandeepan Pathak, Adv. | |
Mr. | Udit Arora, Adv. | |
Mr. | C. D. Singh,Adv. | |
Mr. | D. S. Mahra,Adv. | |
Ms. | Varsha Poddar, Adv. | |
Mr. | Gopal Prasad,Adv. | |
Mr. | Gopal Singh,Adv. | |
Mr. | K.K. Mahalik, Adv. | |
Mr. | Kuldip Singh,Adv. | |
Mr. | Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar,Adv. | |
Mr. | Vibhu Tiwari, Adv. | |
Mr. | Ravi Prakash Mehrotra,Adv. | |
Mr. | Samir Ali Khan,Adv. | |
Mr. | Sanjay Kumar Visen,Adv. | |
Mr. | Sudarshan Singh Rawat,Adv. | |
Mr. | V. N. Raghupathy,Adv. | |
Mr. | Edward Belho, Adv. | |
Signature Not Verified | ||
Mr. | Amit Kumar Singh, Adv. | |
Digitally signed by | ||
RASHI GUPTA | ||
Date: 2016.08.27 | ||
Mr. | K. Luikang Michael, Adv. | |
10:23:59 IST | ||
Reason: | Mr. | Elix Gangmei, Adv. |
Ms. | K. Enatoli Sema,Adv. | |
Mr. | Suryanarayan Singh, Adv. | |
Ms. | Pragati Neekhra,Adv. | |
Ms. | Ruchi Kohli,Adv. | |
Item No.50 | -2- | |
Ms. Shashi Kiran,Adv. Ms. Nithya, Adv. Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna, Adv. Mr. Uday Bhan Singh, Adv. Mr. G.S. Makker, Adv. Mr. Gopal Prasad, Adv.
Mr. Paritosh Anil, Adv. Ms. Ruchi Kohli, Adv. Mr. A. Selvin Raja, Adv.
Mr. A.P. Mayee, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
None appears for respondent Nos.1, 2, 4 to 6, 9, 10, 14, 15, 18, 20, 21, 25, 26, 31, 36, 37 and 39, despite due service.
Respondent Nos.12, 19, 22, 23, 29, 33 and 35 have not filed counter affidavit, despite last opportunity having been granted. Further opportunity is declined.
Defects in the counter affidavit filed by respondent No.16 be cured within two weeks' time.
Affidavit with proof of dasti service of respondent No.11 has not been filed, despite last opportunity having been granted.
Registry to process the matter for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further directions.
(PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar