Vineet Dhanda vs. Union Of India Ministry Of Home Affairs Secretary

REGISTRAR COURT. 1

SECTION PIL $(W)$

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWAL

Writ Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 317/2015

VINEET DHANDA

Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. $Respondent(s)$ (with appln. (s) for permission to file lengthy list of dates) Date: 08/08/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Ms. Raj Rani Dhanda, Adv. Mr. Vineet Dhanda, Adv. Mr. N.A. Usmani, Adv. Dr. J. P. Dhanda, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Abhisth Kumar, Adv. Mr. A. Selvin Raja, Adv. Mr. Aniruddha P. Mayee, Adv. Mr. Sapam Biswajit Meitei, Adv. Mr. Z.H. Isaac Haiding, Adv. Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. S. Ram Subramanian, Adv. Mr. M. Muthuvel Palani, Adv. Mr. Arvind Athithan, Adv. Mr. B. Balaji, Adv. Mr. Sandeepan Pathak, Adv. Mr. C. D. Singh, Adv. Mr. Praneet Pranav, Adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra, Adv. Mr. Gopal Prasad, Adv. Mr. Advitiya Awasthi, Adv. Mr. Gopal Singh, Adv. Mr. Kuldip Singh, Adv. Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar, Adv. Mr. Vibhu Tiwari, Adv. Mr. Ravi Prakash Mehrotra, Adv. Mr. Samir Ali Khan, Adv. Mr. Satish Kumar, Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen, Adv. Mr. M.S. Doabia, Adv. Mr. Sudarshan Singh Rawat, Adv. Mr. V. N. Raghupathy, Adv. Ms. K. Enatoli Sema, Adv. Mr. Suryanarayan Singh, Adv. Ms. Pragati Neekhra, Adv.

Mr. Paritosh Anil, Adv.

Ms. Ruchi Kohli,Adv. Ms. Shashi Kiran,Adv. Mr. Krishnayan Sen, Adv. Mr. Uddyam Mukherjee, Adv. Mr. K.N. MadhuSoodhanan, Adv. Mr. Pragyan Sharma, Adv. Mr. Shikhar Garg, Adv. Ms. K. Enatoli Sema, Adv. Mr. Amit Kumar Singh, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

Opportunity to respondent Nos.24, 28, 30 and 38 to file counter affidavit has already been declined.

Respondent Nos.3, 7, 13, 17, 27, 32 and 34 have already filed the counter affidavit.

Respondent No.16 has also filed the counter affidavit but defective. Defects be cured within two weeks.

Four weeks' time is granted to respondent No.29 for filing counter affidavit.

Four weeks' time, as last opportunity, is granted to respondent Nos.12, 19, 22, 23, 33 and 35 for filing counter affidavit.

None appears for respondent Nos.1, 2, 4 to 6, 14, 15, 20, 21, 31, 36, 37 and 39, despite due service.

Despite last opportunity having been granted, proof of service of respondent Nos.9, 10, 11, 18, 25 and 26 has not been filed. However, the Ld. Counsel for the petitioner seeks another opportunity for filing the same. Last and final opportunity of one week's time is granted.

List again on 24.8.2016.

(PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar