Sant Steel And Alloyrs Pvt. Ltd. Director Sh. Rajender Kumar Khanna vs. Government Of India Ministry Of Commerce
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 999 OF 2007 BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMAS
UNION OF INDIA Appellant (s)
VERSUS
M/S. MOOL CHAND INDUS. ESTATE P.LTD.&ORS Respondent(s)
WITH Civil Appeal NO. 1000 of 2007 Civil Appeal NO. 1002 of 2007 Civil Appeal NO. 1003 of 2007 Civil Appeal NO. 1005 of 2007 (With office report) Civil Appeal NO. 1011 of 2007 (With office report) Civil Appeal NO. 1013 of 2007 (With office report) Civil Appeal NO. 1015 of 2007 (With office report) SLP(C) NO. 13159 of 2007 (With office report) Civil Appeal NO. 1412 of 2007 (With office report) Civil Appeal NO. 1414 of 2007 (With office report) Civil Appeal NO. 2111 of 2007 (With office report) SLP(C) NO. 23674 of 2007 (With office report) SLP(C) NO. 23676 of 2007 (With office report) Civil Appeal NO. 2822 of 2007 (With office report) Civil Appeal NO. 2823 of 2007 (With office report) Civil Appeal NO. 2824 of 2007 (With prayer for interim relief and office report) SLP(C) NO. 7315 of 2007 (With prayer for interim relief and office report) Date: 02/12/2011 This Appeal was called on for hearing today.
Contd...2
ITEM NO.85 -2-
For Appellant(s) Mr.Y.P.Mahajan,adv. Mr.M.Khairati,adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. Mr. Sudhir Kumar Gupta Mrs. Sureshta Bagga Mr.M.P.Devanath For Respondent(s) Mr. Sanjay Jain,Adv. Ms.Neha Agarwal,adv. Mr. E.C. Agrawala Mr. Ejaz Maqbool Mr. Sudhir Kumar Gupta Mrs. Sureshta Bagga Mr. Debasis Misra
Mr. B.V. Balaram Das Mr. Rajan Narain Mr. Sanjay Jain Mr.M.P.Devanath Mr. Sanjai Kumar Pathak Mr. Vivek Gupta UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Civil Appeal Nos. 999/07 and connected matters are ready for hearing and may be listed before the Hon'ble Court as per rules. In SLP(C) No.7315/07 notice addressed to respondent No.1 has been returned unserved. Ld.counsel for the petitioner is granted four weeks time for taking fresh steps in correct address against respondent No.1 as well as against respondent No.2 afresh. In SLP(C) No.13159/07 Ld.counsel for the petitioner has filed a letter stating that SLP has become infructuous. List the above matter before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers.
ITEM NO.85 -3-
In SLP(C) Nos.23674 and 23676/07 await return of notice of the unserved respondents. List the incomplete matters on 18.01.2012.
contd...3
(Sunil Thomas) Registrar
SB