Russel Joy vs. Union Of India Chief Secretary
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Fixed Date by Court
Before:
Hon'ble Hon'Ble The Chief Justice, Hon'ble A.M. Khanwilkar, Hon'ble Hon'Ble The Chief Justice
Stage:
FRESH (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES
Remarks:
Adjourned
Listed On:
10 Sept 2017
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Interlocutory Applications:
89696/2017,
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.63 COURT NO.1 SECTION X
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Writ Petition (Civil) No.878/2017
RUSSEL JOY Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)
(With appln.(s) for appropriate orders/directions)
WITH W.P.(C) No.906/2017
Date : 09-10-2017 These matters were called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD
For Petitioner(s) Mr. Manoj V. George, Adv. Ms. Shilpa Liza George, Adv. Mr. Amit Masih, Adv. Mr. Rajeev Kumar Dubey, Adv. Mr. Kamlendra Mishra, AOR C.R. Jaya Sukin, Adv.
Mr. Narender Kumar Verma, AOR
For Respondent(s)
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
W.P.(C) No.878/2017
Let a copy of this petition be served on the Central Agency so that the Court can be assisted by the learned Attorney General for India.
2
W.P.(C) No.906/2017
In this writ petition, the prayer is to the following extent:-
"Issue writ in the nature of mandamus or other appropriate writ/writs order or direction to the Respondents No.1 to No.3 to declare the MullaiPeriyar Dam and its water catchment area belong to Tamil Nadu State."
In our considered opinion, such a petition cannot be entertained in exercise of Article 32 of the Constitution of India. It is, accordingly, dismissed.
(Chetan Kumar) (H.S. Parasher) Court Master Assistant Registrar