The State Of Odisha vs. Prafulla Kumar Panda
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Fixed Date by Court
Before:
Registrar
Stage:
SERVICE/COMPLIANCE-BEFORE REGISTRAR(J)
Listed On:
14 Oct 2024
In:
Registrar
Category:
UNKNOWN
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
COURT NO.4
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No(s). 46949/2024
[Arising out of impugned judgment and order dated 08-11-2023 in WA No. 230/2023 passed by the High Court of Orissa at Cuttack]
STATE OF ODISHA & ORS.
Petitioner(s)
$Respondent(s)$
VERSUS
BIJAYA KUMAR BARIK
No.297118/2024-CONDONATION OF $(IA)$ ${\bf DELAY}$ IN FILING $\quad\text{and}\quad$ $\mathbf{T}\mathbf{A}$ No.297119/2024-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING / CURING THE No.297116/2024-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DEFECTS and IA DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES)
WITH
Diary No(s). $26342/2024$ (XI-A) No.292127/2024-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING $(\mathtt{IA}$ and $T\Delta$ No.292128/2024-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING / CURING THE $DEFECTS)$
WITH
ITEM NO. 61
SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No(s). 30313/2024 (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. IA No. 298599/2024 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING IA No. 298600/2024 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING / CURING THE DEFECTS)
WITH
Diary No(s). $36791/2024$ (XI-A) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. IA No. 298954/2024 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING IA No. 298956/2024 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING / CURING THE DEFECTS)
Date : 02-01-2025 These petitions were called on for hearing today.
Signa March 1997 : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.V.N. BHATTI $7.04:28$ For Petitioner(s) Ms. Samapika Biswal, AOR Ms. Soumya Sannidhanam, Adv.
$\mathbf{1}$
Mr. B.S. Rajesh Agrajit, Adv. Mr. Milind Kumar, AOR Mr. Shibashish Misra, AOR Mr. Suvendu Suvasis Dash, AOR
For Respondent(s)
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
1. Delay condoned.
2. Learned counsel submits that the issue here is whether the tenure of service in the work charge establishment rendered by the respondent(s) should count towards computing the retirement benefits. In similar case, notice has been issued by this Court.
3. Issue notice.
4. Tag with SLP (Civil) Diary No. 33400 of 2023.
5. In the meantime, the interim order dated 22.03.2021 in the SLP (Civil) Diary No. 6184 of 2021 will operate in the present matter(s) as well.
(NITIN TALREJA) (KAMLESH RAWAT) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR