The State Of Odisha vs. Prafulla Kumar Panda

COURT NO.5

SECTION XI-A

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No(s). 24588/2024

(Arising out of impugned judgment and order dated 16-11-2023 in WA No. 781/2023 passed by the High Court of Orissa at Cuttack)

STATE OF ODISHA & ORS.

Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

RAMAKRUSHNA NAYAK

Respondent $(s)$

$(IA)$ No.225183/2024-CONDONATION DELAY FILING $\mathsf{OF}$ $\mathbf{I}\mathbf{N}$ and $\mathbf{I}\mathbf{A}$ No.225184/2024-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING / CURING THE DEFECTS)

WITH

Diary No(s). 18917/2024 (XI-A) No.229351/2024-CONDONATION $(IA)$ DELAY $IN$ $TA$ $\mathsf{OF}$ FILING and No.229356/2024-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.229353/2024-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING / CURING $$

WITH

ITEM NO. 32 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No(s). 43434/2024 No.225240/2024-CONDONATION OF DELAY $\mathbf{IN}$ $TA$ $(IA)$ FILING and No.225241/2024-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT)

Date: 14-10-2024 These petitions were called on for hearing today.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.V.N. BHATTI

For Petitioner(s)		Mr. Som Raj Choudhury, AOR
		Ms. Shrutee Aradhana, Adv.
	Mr. Siddhant Goel, Adv.

• Ms. Bipasa Tripathy, Adv.
• Mr. Shovan Mishra, AOR

Mr. Niranjan Sahu, AOR

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

1. Delay condoned.

2. Learned counsel submits that the issue here is whether the tenure of service in the work charge establishment rendered by the respondents should count towards computing the retirement benefits. In similar case, notice has been issued by this Court.

3. Issue notice.

4. Tag with SLP (Civil) Diary No. 33400 of 2023.

5. In the meantime, the interim order dated 22.03.2021 in the SLP (Civil) Diary No.6184 of 2021 will operate in the present matters as well.

(NITIN TALREJA) (KAMLESH RAWAT) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR