The State Of Odisha vs. Prafulla Kumar Panda
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
First Hearing
Listed On:
9 Jul 2024
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.21+51
COURT NO.5
SECTION XI-A
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No(s). 22390/2024
(Arising out of impugned judgment and order dated 20-11-2023 in WA No. 1149/2023 passed by the High Court of Orissa at Cuttack)
STATE OF ODISHA & ORS.
Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
BIJOY KUMAR MOHANTY
Respondent $(s)$
(IA No.136893/2024-CONDONATION $\mathsf{OF}$ DELAY $IN$ FILING and $\mathbf{I}\mathbf{A}$ No.136894/2024-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT)
WITH
Diary No(s). 16307/2024 (XI-A) (IA No.137772/2024-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.137774/2024-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.137775/2024-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING / CURING $$
WITH
Diary No. 21410/2024 (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.139829/2024-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.139833/2024-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.139831/2024-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES)
WITH Diary No(s). $16146/2024$ (XI-A) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.139755/2024-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.139760/2024-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.139752/2024-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING / CURING THE DEFECTS) Diary No(s). 25173/2024 (XI-A) (IA No.140343/2024-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.140341/2024-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.140340/2024-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES)
Date: 09-07-2024 These petitions were called on for hearing today. ature Not Verified HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY ∜AM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.V.N. BHATTI
For Petitioner(s) Mr. Arjun Garq, AOR Mr. Aakash Nandolia, Adv. Ms. Sagun Srivastava, Adv. Ms. Kriti Gupta, Adv. Mr. Prakash Ranjan Nayak, AOR Mr. Animesh Dubey, Adv. Mr. Gaurav Khanna, AOR Ms. Natasha Sahrawat, Adv. Mr. Gautam Barnwal, Adv. Mr. Rudraksh Pandey, Adv. Ms. Deepali Bhanot, Adv.
For Respondent(s)
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
Delay condoned.
2. It is pointed out by the learned counsel for the parties that the key issue to be considered in this matter is whether the services rendered in the work charge category can be counted for grant of retiral benefits.
3. Issue notice.
4. Tag with Special Leave Petition (C) Diary No.13545/2024.
(GEETA JOSHI) (KAMLESH RAWAT) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR