Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd vs. Designated Authority Directorate General Of Anti-Dumping And Allied Duties
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Ordinary
Before:
Registrar
Stage:
SERVICE/COMPLIANCE-BEFORE REGISTRAR(J)
Listed On:
22 Jan 2025
In:
Registrar
Category:
UNKNOWN
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
$-1-$
REGISTRAR COURT
SECTION XVII-A
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MS. SUJATA SINGH
Civil Appeal No(s). 6297/2012
M/S HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO.LTD.
Appellant( $s$ )
VERSUS
DESIGNATED AUTH.MIN.OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY Respondent $(s)$
Only Civil Appeal Nos. 6299, 6300 and 6301 of 2012 are to be listed.
WTTH
ITEM NO.5
C.A. No. 5486/2016 (XVII-A) FOR DELETING THE NAME OF PETITIONER/RESPONDENT ON IA 242049/2024
C.A. No. 6299/2012 (XVII-A)
C.A. No. 6301/2012 (XVII-A)
C.A. No. 6300/2012 (XVII-A)
Date: 22-01-2025 This appeal was called on for hearing today.
For Appellant(s) : Mr. M. P. Devanath, AOR Ms. Falguni Gupta, Adv. Mr. Ayush Agarwal, Adv.
Mr. Ravi Bharuka, AOR Ms. Jaya Bharuka, Adv. Mr. Rohit Agarwal, Adv.
For Respondent(s): Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR
Mr. Rakesh K. Sharma, AOR Mr. T.L.V. Ramachari, Adv. Mr. Mahipal Singh, Adv. Mr. Anuj Tiwari, Adv. Ms. Niharika Dewivedi, Adv. Mr. Gurjinder Kaur, Adv. Mr. Sandeep Singh Dingra, Adv. Ms. Praveena Gautam, AOR Mr. Pawan Shukla, Adv. Ms. Akanksha Tyagi, Adv.
Ms. Tissy Thomas, Adv.
Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, AOR Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR Mr. Prem Prakash, AOR
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
C.A. No. 6299/2012
Respondent nos.1 and 2 are common respondents in C.A. No. 6300/2012 and are duly represented therein. Hence, service is complete.
Earlier Ld. Counsel for respondent no.3 has been designated as Senior Advocate. Respondent no.3 is served with alternative arrangement notice, still none has entered appearance.
Ld. Counsel for the appellant and earlier Ld. counsel for Respondent no.3 has already filed statement of case.
Hence, process the matter for listing before the Hon'ble Court, as per rules.
C.A. No. 6301/2012
Respondent nos.1 and 2 are duly represented.
Earlier Ld. Counsel for respondent nos.3 and 4 has been designated as Senior Advocate. Respondent no.4 is served with alternative arrangement notice, still none has entered appearance.
Respondent no.3 is not served with alternative arrangement notice due to remarks "Addressee cannot be located". Hence, Two weeks time is granted to Ld. counsel for the appellant to file fresh particulars for issuance of alternative arrangement notice to respondent no.3.
Counsel for the appellant has already filed statement of case. List again on 24.02.2025.
-3-
C.A. No. 6300/2012
Respondent nos.1 and 2 are duly represented.
Earlier Ld. Counsel for respondent no.3 has been designated as Senior Advocate. Respondent no.3 is served with alternative arrangement notice, still none has entered appearance.
Hence, process the matter for listing before the Hon'ble Court, as per rules.
Counter affidavit, if any be filed in the meantime.
SUJATA SINGH Registrar
pm