The State Of Jharkhand Home Department Secretary vs. Prince Khan Etc

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble Hon'Ble The Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi, R. Banumathi
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:15 Dec 2021
CNR:SCIN010162012017

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

After Week/Month/Vacation

Before:

Hon'ble Ajay Rastogi, Hon'ble Abhay S. Oka

Stage:

AFTER NOTICE (FOR ADMISSION) - CRIMINAL CASES

Remarks:

Dismissed

Listed On:

15 Dec 2021

In:

Judge

Category:

UNKNOWN

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

COURT NO.14

SECTION II-A

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). $4729 -$ 4730/2017

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 23-02-2017 in WP No. 282/2016 and WP No. 286/2016 passed by the High Court Of Jharkhand At Ranchi)

THE STATE OF JHARKHAND & ORS.

PETITIONER(S)

VERSUS

PRINCE KHAN ETC.

RESPONDENT(S)

Date: 15-12-2021 These petitions were called on for hearing today.

  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY S. OKA
  • For Petitioner(s) Mr. Anish Jaipuriar, Adv. Mr. Kumar Anurag Singh, Adv. Mr. Anando Mukherjee, AOR Mr. Zain A. Khan, Adv. Mr. Shwetank Singh, Adv.

For Respondent(s)

Ms. Sangeeta Singh, AOR

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following ORDER

In the instant petitions, the order of detention in terms of the provisions of the Bihar Control of Crimes Act, 1981 (as adopted by the State of Jharkhand) has expired long back.

Learned Counsel for the petitioners wants to submit that what been observed by the High Court in the impugned judgment is not in conformity with the view expressed by this Court reported in Mrs. T. Devaki vs. Government of Tamil Nadu and Ors. (1990) 2 SCC

456, and has also brought to our notice the later judgment of the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi passed in W.P. (Cr.) No. 282 of 2017 decided on 19.12.2017 where the impugned judgment has been taken note of and not concurred with the view expressed.

In the given facts and circumstances and the fact that the alleged detention has expired long back with a passage of time, we find no reason to entertain the present Special Leave Petitions which are, accordingly, dismissed.

However, the question of law is left open.

Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

(POOJA SHARMA) (BEENA JOLLY)

COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)