Rohidas Gajaram@Gajanan Satpute vs. The State Of Maharashtra Rep. By The Chief Secretary Home Department

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble Hon'Ble The Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:9 May 2018
CNR:SCIN010161762018

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

PETITION(S) FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CRL.) NO(S). 3843/2018 (ARISING OUT OF IMPUGNED FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 20-03-2018 IN ABA NO. 193/2018 PASSED BY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY AT AURANGABAD)

ROHIDAS GAJARAM @ GAJANAN SATPUTE PETITIONER(S)

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA RESPONDENT(S) (FOR ADMISSION AND I.R. AND IA NO.64203/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT AND IA NO.64202/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. )

Date : 09-05-2018 This petition was called on for hearing today.

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI

For Petitioner(s) Mr. Nitin Gaware, Adv. Mr. Rajendra A. Adv. Mr. Abhishek Chauhan, Adv. Mr. Sushil Pandey, Adv. Mr. Ashutosh Dubey, AOR

For Respondent(s)

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the relevant material.

Exemption from filing certified copy of the impugned order and O.T. is granted.

The Special Leave Petition is not entertained and is accordingly dismissed. However, in the event the petitioner surrenders and moves for regular bail if so advised, such prayer as and when made shall be considered as expeditiously as the business of the learned trial Court would permit. We make it clear that we have expressed no opinion on the merits of the case.

[VINOD LAKHINA] [ASHA SONI] AR-cum-PS BRANCH OFFICER