In Re Section 6a Of The Citizenship Act 1955 vs. Union Of India Ministry Of Home Affairs Secretary

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble Hon'Ble The Chief Justice
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:3 Apr 2013
CNR:SCIN010161132009

AI Summary

In a significant Public Interest Litigation concerning the constitutional validity of Section 6A of the Citizenship Act, 1955, the Supreme Court heard arguments for a brief period on April 2, 2013, before adjourning the matter as part-heard. This case, initiated by Assam Public Works, addresses critical issues affecting citizenship rights in Assam.

Case Identifiers

Primary Case No:274 of 2009
Case Type:Writ Petition (Civil)
Case Sub-Type:Writ Petition (Civil) - Public Interest Litigation regarding Citizenship Act
Secondary Case Numbers:16113/2009, SCIN010161132009, 016113
Order Date:2013-04-02
Filing Year:2009
Court:Supreme Court Of India
Bench:Division Bench
Judges:Hon'ble H. L. Gokhale, Hon'ble Ranjan Gogoi

Petitioner's Counsel

Arvind Kumar Sharma
Advocate - Not Present

Respondent's Counsel

Syed Ali Ahmad
Advocate - Appeared
Syed Tanweer Ahmad
Advocate - Appeared
S. S. Bandyopadhyay
Advocate - Appeared
Praveen Kumar
Advocate - Appeared
Mohd. Shah Nawaz Hasan
Advocate - Appeared
Mohan Pandey
Advocate - Appeared
Meenakshi Arora
Advocate - Appeared
Mohit D. Ram
Advocate - Appeared
S. Nanda Kumar
Advocate - Appeared
Prabhat Kumar
Advocate - Appeared
B. K. Prasad
Advocate - Appeared
Shreekant N. Terdal
Advocate - Appeared
Avijit Roy
Advocate - Appeared
Navnit Kumar
Advocate - Appeared

Advocates on Record

Corporate Law Group

eCourtsIndia AITM

Brief Facts Summary

The case is a Writ Petition (Civil) No. 274 of 2009, filed by Assam Public Works against the Union of India and others. On April 2, 2013, the Supreme Court, comprising Hon'ble Mr. Justice H.L. Gokhale and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Gogoi, heard arguments from counsel for a few minutes, after which the matter remained part-heard.

Timeline of Events

2009

Writ Petition (Civil) No. 274 of 2009 filed by Assam Public Works.

2013-04-02

Supreme Court heard arguments, matter remained part-heard.

Primary Legal Issues

1.Constitutional validity of Section 6A of the Citizenship Act, 1955

Statutes Applied

Citizenship Act
Section 6A
The core subject of the writ petition, challenging its constitutional validity.

Court's Reasoning

The court's decision in this order was purely procedural, noting that the matter remained part-heard after initial arguments, without delving into the substantive merits or providing any reasoning for the underlying dispute.

Order Nature:Procedural
Disposition Status:Part-heard

Precedential Assessment

Non-Binding (Procedural)

This order is purely procedural, merely noting that the matter remained part-heard. It does not lay down any legal principles or make substantive rulings, thus having no precedential value.

Tips for Legal Practice

1.Advocates should meticulously track 'part-heard' matters, as they often entail subsequent hearings before the same bench.
2.Understand that procedural orders like this indicate ongoing litigation, and substantive developments are yet to occur.

Legal Tags

Public Interest Litigation concerning Citizenship ActSupreme Court constitutional challenge of Section 6AAssam Accord implications on citizenship determinationWrit Petition (Civil) procedural hearing statusLegal dispute over Indian immigration policy in Assam

Disclaimer: eCourtsIndia (ECI) is not a lawyer and this analysis is generated by ECI AI, it might make mistakes. This is not a legal advice. Please consult with a qualified legal professional for matters requiring legal expertise.

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Case Registered

Listed On:

3 Jul 2009

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

4 ITEM NO.106 COURT NO.13 SECTION PIL S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.274 OF 2009 ASSAM PUBLIC WORKS Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS Respondent(s) (With appln(s) for directions, permission to file additional documents, permission to file rejoinder affidavit and office report) Date: 02/04/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. GOKHALE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI For Petitioner(s) Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma,Adv.(N/P) For Respondent(s) Mr. Syed Ali Ahmad,Adv. Mr. Syed Tanweer Ahmad,Adv. Mr. S.S. Bandyopadhyay,Adv. Mr. Praveen Kumar,Adv. Mr. Mohd. Shah Nawaz Hasan,Adv. Mr. Mohan Pandey,Adv. Ms. Meenakshi Arora,Adv. Mr. Mohit D. Ram,Adv. Mr. S. Nanda Kuamr,Adv. Mr. Prabhat Kumar,Adv. Mr. B.K. Prasad,Adv. Mr. Shreekant N. Terdal,Adv. Mr. Avijit Roy,Adv. Mr. Navnit Kumar,Adv. for M/s. Corporate Law Group,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard Mr. Avijit Roy, learned counsel and Ms. Meenakshi Arora, learned counsel for few minutes. The matter remained part-heard. [ Alka Dudeja ] [ Sneh Lata Sharma ]

A.R.-cum-P.S. Court Master

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(134) - 17 Oct 2024

Judgement - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(135) - 17 Oct 2024

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(133) - 12 Dec 2023

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(132) - 7 Dec 2023

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(131) - 6 Dec 2023

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(130) - 5 Dec 2023

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(129) - 6 Nov 2023

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(128) - 20 Sept 2023

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(127) - 10 Jan 2023

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(126) - 13 Dec 2022

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(125) - 1 Nov 2022

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(124) - 7 Sept 2022

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(123) - 29 Jan 2021

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(122) - 21 Jan 2021

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(121) - 13 Jan 2021

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(120) - 6 Jan 2020

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(119) - 16 Dec 2019

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(118) - 18 Oct 2019

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(116) - 13 Aug 2019

Judgement - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(117) - 13 Aug 2019

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(115) - 8 Aug 2019

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(114) - 23 Jul 2019

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(113) - 19 Jul 2019

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(112) - 30 May 2019

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(111) - 28 May 2019

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(110) - 8 May 2019

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(109) - 22 Apr 2019

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(108) - 10 Apr 2019

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(107) - 13 Mar 2019

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(106) - 5 Feb 2019

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(105) - 24 Jan 2019

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(104) - 12 Dec 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(103) - 10 Dec 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(102) - 7 Dec 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(101) - 1 Nov 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(100) - 23 Oct 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(99) - 19 Sept 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(98) - 14 Sept 2018

ROP

Click to view

Order(97) - 5 Sept 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(96) - 28 Aug 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(95) - 16 Aug 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(94) - 7 Aug 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(93) - 31 Jul 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(92) - 2 Jul 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(91) - 17 May 2018

ROP

Click to view

Order(90) - 8 May 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(89) - 27 Mar 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(88) - 20 Feb 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(87) - 5 Feb 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(86) - 15 Dec 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(85) - 14 Dec 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(84) - 30 Nov 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(83) - 29 Nov 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(82) - 22 Nov 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(81) - 9 Nov 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(80) - 14 Sept 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(79) - 12 Sept 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(78) - 31 Jul 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(77) - 21 Jul 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(76) - 13 Jul 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(73) - 8 May 2017

Office Report

Click to view

Order(74) - 8 May 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(75) - 8 May 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(71) - 20 Apr 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(72) - 20 Apr 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(69) - 19 Apr 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(70) - 19 Apr 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(67) - 8 Mar 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(68) - 8 Mar 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(65) - 21 Feb 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(66) - 21 Feb 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(63) - 14 Feb 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(64) - 14 Feb 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(61) - 7 Feb 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(62) - 7 Feb 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(59) - 15 Dec 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(60) - 15 Dec 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(54) - 26 Oct 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(55) - 26 Oct 2016

Office Report

Click to view

Order(56) - 26 Oct 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(57) - 26 Oct 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(58) - 26 Oct 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(52) - 10 Mar 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(53) - 10 Mar 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(50) - 17 Feb 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(51) - 17 Feb 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(48) - 12 Feb 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(49) - 12 Feb 2016

Office Report

Click to view

Order(46) - 13 Jan 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(47) - 13 Jan 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(44) - 1 Dec 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(45) - 1 Dec 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(42) - 5 Nov 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(43) - 5 Nov 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(40) - 6 Oct 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(41) - 6 Oct 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(38) - 4 Sept 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(39) - 4 Sept 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(36) - 21 Jul 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(37) - 21 Jul 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(35) - 14 Jul 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(34) - 13 May 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(32) - 31 Mar 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(33) - 31 Mar 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(30) - 17 Dec 2014

ROP

Click to view

Order(31) - 17 Dec 2014

Judgment

Click to view

Order(27) - 10 Nov 2014

ROP

Click to view

Order(28) - 10 Nov 2014

Office Report

Click to view

Order(29) - 10 Nov 2014

ROP

Click to view

Order(25) - 17 Oct 2014

ROP

Click to view

Order(26) - 17 Oct 2014

ROP

Click to view

Order(23) - 16 Oct 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(24) - 16 Oct 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(21) - 23 Sept 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(22) - 23 Sept 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(20) - 20 Aug 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(19) - 4 Aug 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(18) - 3 Feb 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(17) - 25 Oct 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(16) - 18 Oct 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(15) - 23 Aug 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(14) - 2 Aug 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(13) - 16 Jul 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(12) - 8 May 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(11) - 7 May 2013

ROP

Click to view

Order(9) - 10 Apr 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(10) - 10 Apr 2013

ROP

Click to view

Order(8) - 3 Apr 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Viewing

Order(7) - 2 Apr 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(6) - 4 Mar 2013

ROP

Click to view

Order(5) - 23 Feb 2011

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(4) - 22 Nov 2010

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(3) - 4 Oct 2010

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(2) - 9 Feb 2010

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(1) - 20 Jul 2009

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view
Similar Case Search