In Re Section 6a Of The Citizenship Act 1955 vs. Union Of India Ministry Of Home Affairs Secretary

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble Hon'Ble The Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi, Rohinton Fali Nariman
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:19 Jul 2019
CNR:SCIN010161132009

AI Summary

The Supreme Court has issued crucial directives regarding the establishment of 200 additional Foreigners Tribunals in Assam and the expeditious completion of the National Register of Citizens (NRC) process. The order modifies recruitment qualifications for Tribunal members and sets strict timelines, ensuring fair hearings for all affected parties. This interim order is a significant step towards addressing the complex issues of citizenship and residency in Assam, impacting countless lives.

Ratio Decidendi:
For the efficient and lawful determination of citizenship status in Assam, it is imperative to promptly operationalize a sufficient number of Foreigners Tribunals with members possessing adequate judicial experience, and to ensure that the NRC updation process provides fair hearing opportunities to all affected parties within stipulated timelines.
Obiter Dicta:
The Court's emphasis on adherence to the Foreigners (Tribunal) Order, 1964, and the need for individuals with 'judicial experience' in quasi-judicial roles underscores a broader principle of ensuring competent adjudication in matters of significant individual rights.

Case Identifiers

Primary Case No:W.P.(C) No.274/2009
Case Type:Writ Petition (Civil)
Case Sub-Type:Writ Petition - National Register of Citizens (NRC) & Foreigners Tribunals
Secondary Case Numbers:W.P.(C) No.1045/2018
Order Date:2019-05-30
Filing Year:2009
Court:Supreme Court of India
Bench:Two Judge Bench
Judges:Hon'ble Hon'Ble The Chief Justice, Hon'ble Aniruddha Bose

Petitioner's Counsel

Kailash Prashad Pandey
Advocate on Record - Appeared

Respondent's Counsel

Tushar Mehta
Solicitor General - Appeared
Rekha Pandey
Advocate - Appeared
Binu Tamta
Advocate - Appeared
R. M. Bajaj
Advocate - Appeared
Shraddha Deshmukh
Advocate - Appeared
Ankur Talwar
Advocate - Appeared
Raghavendra Mohan Bajaj
Advocate - Appeared
B. V. Balaram Das
Advocate on Record - Appeared
Gaurav Dhingra
Advocate on Record - Appeared
Madhumita Bhattacharjee
Advocate on Record - Appeared
Shadan Farasat
Advocate on Record - Appeared
Snehasish Mukherjee
Advocate on Record - Appeared
Guntur Prabhakar
Advocate on Record - Appeared
Mohit D. Ram
Advocate on Record - Appeared
Monisha Handa
Advocate - Appeared
Abhijit Sengupta
Advocate on Record - Appeared
Abdul Qadir
Advocate - Appeared
Ibad Mushtaq
Advocate - Appeared
Fuzail Ahmad Ayyubi
Advocate on Record - Appeared
Shuvodeep Roy
Advocate on Record - Appeared
Rajat Nair
Advocate - Appeared
Mohan Pandey
Advocate on Record - Appeared
Shibashish Misra
Advocate on Record - Appeared
Malvika Trivedi
Advocate - Appeared
Ankit Yadva
Advocate - Appeared
T. Mahipal
Advocate on Record - Appeared
Uttara Babbar
Advocate on Record - Appeared
Sanand Ramakrishnan
Advocate on Record - Appeared
Rashmi Singhania
Advocate on Record - Appeared
Avijit Roy
Advocate on Record - Appeared
Rashmi Nandakumar
Advocate on Record - Appeared
Corporate Law Group
Advocate Firm - Appeared
Mansoor Ali
Advocate on Record - Appeared
P. I. Jose
Advocate - Appeared
Shakeel Ahmad
Advocate - Appeared
Sadiq Shakeel
Advocate - Appeared
Vishakha
Advocate - Appeared
Hemantika Wahi
Advocate - Appeared
M. Yogesh Kanna
Advocate - Appeared
S. Parthasarathi
Advocate - Appeared

Advocates on Record

Kailash Prashad Pandey
B. V. Balaram Das
Gaurav Dhingra
Madhumita Bhattacharjee
Shadan Farasat
Snehasish Mukherjee
Guntur Prabhakar
Mohit D. Ram
Abhijit Sengupta
Fuzail Ahmad Ayyubi
Shuvodeep Roy
Mohan Pandey
Shibashish Misra
T. Mahipal
Uttara Babbar
Sanand Ramakrishnan
Rashmi Singhania
Avijit Roy
Rashmi Nandakumar
Mansoor Ali

eCourtsIndia AITM

Brief Facts Summary

The Supreme Court is overseeing the National Register of Citizens (NRC) updation in Assam and the establishment of Foreigners Tribunals. The State of Assam presented a plan on May 24, 2019, for setting up 200 additional Foreigners Tribunals and recruiting members, including specific timelines. The proposed qualifications for members included advocates, retired judicial officers, and retired IAS/ACS officers with quasi-judicial experience. The Court, after hearing counsels, specifically modified the qualification for retired civil servants to mandate 'judicial experience' instead of merely 'quasi-judicial works' to ensure compliance with the Foreigners (Tribunal) Order, 1964. The Court also directed the State Coordinator to ensure the timely and fair disposal of NRC claims by July 31, 2019.

Timeline of Events

2009-07-03

Primary case W.P.(C) No.274/2009 registered.

2019-05-24

Meeting held regarding selection of Members and staff for additional Foreigners Tribunals in Assam.

2019-05-29

Letter addressed by Secretary to Govt. of Assam to Gauhati High Court Registrar (Judicial) detailing proposed qualifications for Tribunal Members.

2019-05-30

Supreme Court hearing and issuance of this order, allowing intervention application and giving directions.

2019-05-30

Government of Assam directed to write to Gauhati High Court to initiate recruitment process by this date.

2019-06-10 / 2019-06-12

Gauhati High Court Registry to issue advertisement for selection of Members.

2019-07-15

Interview process for Members to commence.

2019-07-31

Deadline for publication of final NRC; State Coordinator to ensure disposal of claims and objections.

2019-08-20

Result for Member selection to be declared.

2019-09-01

Newly recruited Members to join duty; 200 additional Foreigners Tribunals to be functional.

Key Factual Findings

The application for intervention filed on behalf of All Assam Students Union and Another stands allowed.

Source: Current Court Finding

The qualification of retired civil servants for appointment as Foreigners Tribunal Members should be 'Retired civil servants (not below the rank of Secretary and Additional Secretary) having judicial experience', aligning with Clause 2(2) of the Foreigners (Tribunal) Order, 1964.

Source: Current Court Finding

200 additional Foreigners Tribunals must be functional on or before September 1, 2019.

Source: Current Court Finding

The hearing of claims and objections for the NRC are currently ongoing and must be complied with strictly in accordance with law and disposed of by July 31, 2019.

Source: Recited from State Coordinator Report and Current Court Direction

Primary Legal Issues

1.Recruitment and operationalization of Foreigners Tribunals in Assam
2.Expeditious and fair completion of the National Register of Citizens (NRC) updation process in Assam

Secondary Legal Issues

1.Qualifications for members of Foreigners Tribunals
2.Judicial oversight of administrative processes concerning citizenship
3.Ensuring due process and fair hearing in citizenship determination

Statutes Applied

Foreigners (Tribunal) Order
Clause 2(2)
The qualification for retired civil servants for Foreigners Tribunals was modified to align with the requirements of this clause, emphasizing the need for 'judicial experience'.

Petitioner's Arguments

The petitioner's arguments, implicitly supported by the Amicus Curiae, focus on ensuring the efficiency and fairness of the process, including proper staffing of the Foreigners Tribunals and adherence to legal standards for NRC updation.

Respondent's Arguments

The State of Assam, represented by the Solicitor General, presented documents outlining steps for setting up additional Foreigners Tribunals and their proposed qualifications, indicating a commitment to implement court directions, while also presenting practical aspects of recruitment.

Court's Reasoning

The Court's reasoning is primarily driven by the need for timely and effective resolution of the NRC and foreigners' issues in Assam. It seeks to ensure the functionality of adequate Foreigners Tribunals, recognizing the urgency and public importance. The modification of the qualification for Tribunal members was made to ensure that appointed individuals possess relevant 'judicial experience', aligning with the Foreigners (Tribunal) Order, 1964, and ensuring the quality of adjudications. The court also emphasizes the need for fairness and due process in handling claims and objections related to NRC.

Statutory Interpretation Method:
Purposive
Judicial Philosophy Indicators:
  • Emphasis on Efficiency and Timeliness
  • Emphasis on Natural Justice and Fair Hearing
  • Pragmatic Approach to Implementation
  • Judicial Oversight of Executive Action
Order Nature:Interim
Disposition Status:Pending
Disposition Outcome:Allowed

Specific Directions

  1. 1.Application for intervention on behalf of All Assam Students Union and Another in W.P.(C) No.1045/2018 is allowed.
  2. 2.Government of Assam to write to Gauhati High Court by 2019-05-30 to initiate recruitment process for Foreigners Tribunals.
  3. 3.Gauhati High Court Registry to issue advertisement by 2019-06-10/2019-06-12 for selection of Members for 200 Foreigners Tribunals (Phase-I).
  4. 4.Interview process for Members to commence from 2019-07-15, with results by 2019-08-20.
  5. 5.Newly recruited Members for Foreigners Tribunals to join duty by 2019-09-01.
  6. 6.Two-day orientation program for newly appointed Members to be conducted before joining.
  7. 7.Qualification for retired civil servants for Foreigners Tribunals modified to 'Retired civil servants (not below the rank of Secretary and Additional Secretary) having judicial experience'.
  8. 8.Gauhati High Court Registrar and State Government authority to ensure 200 additional Foreigners Tribunals are functional on or before 2019-09-01.
  9. 9.Shri Prateek Hajela (State Coordinator) to ensure hearing and disposal of NRC claims and objections strictly by law by 2019-07-31, ensuring fair opportunity and production of documents.
  10. 10.Shri Hajela permitted to mention the matter before Secretary General or Registrar J-I/J-II of this Court during summer vacation if required.
  11. 11.All developments concerning additional Foreigners Tribunals and deportation policy to be informed to Mr. Gourab Banerji, Amicus Curiae.
  12. 12.Both matters to be listed analogously immediately on reopening.

Precedential Assessment

Binding (SC)

As an order from the Supreme Court of India, the highest court, its directions are binding on all lower courts and authorities, particularly on the specific parties and processes involved in the Assam NRC and Foreigners Tribunals.

Tips for Legal Practice

1.Advocates should monitor the recruitment process and qualifications for Foreigners Tribunal members for potential challenges or appointments.
2.Legal professionals representing parties in NRC claims must ensure strict adherence to timelines and presentation of relevant documents, noting the emphasis on fair hearing.
3.Amicus Curiae reports and court directions in PILs like this provide critical insights into judicial oversight of large-scale administrative reforms.

Legal Tags

Supreme Court Monitoring of National Register of Citizens ProcessForeigners Tribunals Recruitment Qualifications Judicial ReviewCitizenship Determination Process Due Process Requirements IndiaAssam NRC Updation Timeline Compliance and OversightRole of Amicus Curiae in Public Interest Litigation

Disclaimer: eCourtsIndia (ECI) is not a lawyer and this analysis is generated by ECI AI, it might make mistakes. This is not a legal advice. Please consult with a qualified legal professional for matters requiring legal expertise.

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Fixed Date by Court

Before:

Hon'ble Hon'Ble The Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi, Hon'ble Rohinton Fali Nariman

Stage:

AFTER NOTICE (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES

Remarks:

List On (Date) [23-07-2019], List before court/bench [on 23.07.2019 at 3 PM]

Listed On:

19 Jul 2019

In:

Judge

Category:

UNKNOWN

Interlocutory Applications:

98446/2019,98512/2019,

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

ITEM NO.1 COURT NO.1 SECTION PIL-W

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Writ Petition (Civil) No.274/2009

ASSAM PUBLIC WORKS Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)

WITH W.P.(C) No.1045/2018 (PIL-W) (With appln.(s) for intervention)

Date : 30-05-2019 These petitions were called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA BOSE (VACATION BENCH)

Mr. Gourab Banerji, Sr. Adv., A.C. Mr. Prashant Bhushan, Adv., A.C. (N/P) Mr. Govind Jee, Adv. Ms. Alice Raj, Adv.

For Petitioner(s)

Mr. Kailash Prashad Pandey, AOR

For Respondent(s) Mr. Tushar Mehta, SG Ms. Rekha Pandey, Adv. Ms. Binu Tamta, Adv. Mr. R.M. Bajaj, Adv. Ms. Shraddha Deshmukh, Adv. Mr. Ankur Talwar, Adv. Mr. Raghavendra Mohan Bajaj, Adv. Mr. B. V. Balaram Das, AOR

Mr. Gaurav Dhingra, AOR
Ms. Madhumita Bhattacharjee, AOR
Mr. Shadan Farasat, AOR
Mr. Snehasish Mukherjee, AOR
Mr. Guntur Prabhakar, AOR
Mr. Mohit D. Ram, AOR<br>Ms. Monisha Handa, Adv.
Mr. Abhijit Sengupta, AOR
Mr. Abdul Qadir, Adv.<br>Mr. Ibad Mushtaq, Adv.<br>Mr. Fuzail Ahmad Ayyubi, AOR
Mr. Tushar Mehta, SG<br>Mr. Shuvodeep Roy, AOR<br>Mr. Rajat Nair, Adv.
Mr. Mohan Pandey, AOR
Mr. Shibashish Misra, AOR
Ms. Malvika Trivedi, Adv.<br>Mr. Ankit Yadva, Adv.<br>Mr. T. Mahipal, AOR
Ms. Uttara Babbar, AOR
Mr. Sanand Ramakrishnan, AOR
Ms. Rashmi Singhania, AOR
Mr. Avijit Roy, AOR
Ms. Rashmi Nandakumar, AOR
M/s.Corporate Law Group
Mr. Mansoor Ali, AOR
Mr. Vijay Hansaria, Sr. Adv.<br>Mr. P.I. Jose, Adv.<br>Mr. Shakeel Ahmad, Adv.

3

Mr. Sadiq Shakeel, Adv. Ms. Vishakha, Adv. Ms. Hemantika Wahi, Adv. Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna, Adv. Mr. S. Parthasarathi, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

I.A. No.85011/2019 in W.P.(C) No.1045/2018

The application for intervention filed on behalf of All Assam Students Union and Another stands allowed.

W.P.(C) No.1045/2018

Shri Tushar Mehta, learned Solicitor General appearing for the State of Assam has placed before the Court a set of documents relevant to the issue under consideration i.e. setting up of additional Foreigners Tribunals in the State of Assam.

Amongst the documents filed, our attention has been drawn to the proceedings dated 24th May, 2019, held in connection with selection of the Members and staff for the proposed additional Foreigners Tribunals.

In the meeting held on 24th May, 2019, the following steps have been envisaged for filling up the posts of Members to man the 200 Foreigners Tribunals. The relevant extract from the Minutes of the Meeting dated 24th May, 2019, is extracted below:-

"In this regard, the Government of Assam shall write to the Gauhati High Court by 30-05-2019 with a request to initiate the recruitment process. On receipt of the letter, the Registry shall issue advertisement by 10-06-2019/12-06- 2019 for selection of Members for the 200 (two hundred) Foreigners Tribunals in Phase – I. The interview process is to commence w.e.f. 15-07-2019, with the result being declared by 20-08-2019. Once the entire recruitment process for selection of Members is completed, the newly recruited Members are to join duty by 01-09-2019. Further, it is proposed that a 2 (two) day orientation programme for the newly appointed Members be conducted before the Members report for duty."

Pursuant thereto, a letter dated 29th May, 2019 has been addressed by the Secretary to the Govt. of Assam, Home & Political Department to the Registrar (Judicial), Gauhati High Court, indicating the following to be the qualifications and conditions of service of the Members to be selected to man the additional Foreigners Tribunals:

"(i) Advocates not below the age of 35 years of age with at least 7 years of practice: or (ii) Retired Judicial Officers from the

4

5

Assam Judicial Service; or

(iii) Retired IAS of ACS Officers (not below the rank of Secretary/Addl. Secretary) having experience in quasi-judicial works.

(iv) The retirement age of the Members so appointed will be 67 years."

While the process of selection and appointment of Members of the Foreigners Tribunals, as indicated in the meeting held on 24th May, 2019 (extracted above), shall continue, the Court is of the view that so far as the qualification of Members to be indicated in the advertisement to be issued shall, instead of clause (iii) as proposed, be as follows:-

"(iii) Retired civil servants (not below the rank of Secretary and Additional Secretary) having judicial experience."

The above stipulation in the advertisement with regard to the qualification, in our considered view, would meet the requirement of clause 2(2) of the Foreigners (Tribunal) Order, 1964, which has been pointed out by Shri Vijay Hansaria, learned senior counsel appearing for the High Court of Gauhati and Shri Gourab Banerji, learned Amicus Curiae.

The concerned Registrar of the Gauhati High Court and the concerned authority in the State Government shall now proceed to act in the matter as per the resolution of the Meeting dated 24th May, 2019 (as extracted above), subject to the modification in clause (iii) of the qualifications indicated in the present order. The aforesaid authority shall ensure that 200 additional Foreigners Tribunals are functional on or before 1st September, 2019.

Insofar as the main matter i.e. Writ Petition (Civil) No.274 of 2009 is concerned, we have taken note of the Report submitted by the learned State Coordinator, Shri Prateek Hajela. Shri Hajela shall ensure that the hearing of the claims and objections, which are currently going on, are complied with strictly in accordance with law by the concerned officers and authorities who are considering such claims and objections and that all such claims and objections are heard and disposed of well in time to ensure publication of the final NRC on the date stipulated by the Court i.e. 31st July, 2019. While doing so, Shri Hajela will ensure that all affected parties get a fair opportunity of hearing and to produce relevant documents.

Shri Hajela is also permitted to mention the matter before the Secretary General or Registrar J-I/J-II of this

6

Court for being taken up any day during the summer vacation, if so required.

All developments in the matter of constitution of additional Foreigners Tribunals and policy decisions arrived at with regard to deportation, be informed to Shri Gourab Banerji, learned Amicus Curiae from time to time.

Both the matter to be listed analogously immediately on reopening unless otherwise mentioned.

(Chetan Kumar) (Anand Prakash) A.R.-cum-P.S. Court Master

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(134) - 17 Oct 2024

Judgement - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(135) - 17 Oct 2024

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(133) - 12 Dec 2023

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(132) - 7 Dec 2023

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(131) - 6 Dec 2023

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(130) - 5 Dec 2023

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(129) - 6 Nov 2023

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(128) - 20 Sept 2023

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(127) - 10 Jan 2023

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(126) - 13 Dec 2022

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(125) - 1 Nov 2022

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(124) - 7 Sept 2022

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(123) - 29 Jan 2021

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(122) - 21 Jan 2021

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(121) - 13 Jan 2021

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(120) - 6 Jan 2020

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(119) - 16 Dec 2019

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(118) - 18 Oct 2019

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(116) - 13 Aug 2019

Judgement - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(117) - 13 Aug 2019

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(115) - 8 Aug 2019

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(114) - 23 Jul 2019

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(113) - 19 Jul 2019

ROP - of Main Case

Viewing

Order(112) - 30 May 2019

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(111) - 28 May 2019

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(110) - 8 May 2019

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(109) - 22 Apr 2019

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(108) - 10 Apr 2019

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(107) - 13 Mar 2019

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(106) - 5 Feb 2019

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(105) - 24 Jan 2019

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(104) - 12 Dec 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(103) - 10 Dec 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(102) - 7 Dec 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(101) - 1 Nov 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(100) - 23 Oct 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(99) - 19 Sept 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(98) - 14 Sept 2018

ROP

Click to view

Order(97) - 5 Sept 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(96) - 28 Aug 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(95) - 16 Aug 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(94) - 7 Aug 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(93) - 31 Jul 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(92) - 2 Jul 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(91) - 17 May 2018

ROP

Click to view

Order(90) - 8 May 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(89) - 27 Mar 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(88) - 20 Feb 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(87) - 5 Feb 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(86) - 15 Dec 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(85) - 14 Dec 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(84) - 30 Nov 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(83) - 29 Nov 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(82) - 22 Nov 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(81) - 9 Nov 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(80) - 14 Sept 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(79) - 12 Sept 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(78) - 31 Jul 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(77) - 21 Jul 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(76) - 13 Jul 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(73) - 8 May 2017

Office Report

Click to view

Order(74) - 8 May 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(75) - 8 May 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(71) - 20 Apr 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(72) - 20 Apr 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(69) - 19 Apr 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(70) - 19 Apr 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(67) - 8 Mar 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(68) - 8 Mar 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(65) - 21 Feb 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(66) - 21 Feb 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(63) - 14 Feb 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(64) - 14 Feb 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(61) - 7 Feb 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(62) - 7 Feb 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(59) - 15 Dec 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(60) - 15 Dec 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(54) - 26 Oct 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(55) - 26 Oct 2016

Office Report

Click to view

Order(56) - 26 Oct 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(57) - 26 Oct 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(58) - 26 Oct 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(52) - 10 Mar 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(53) - 10 Mar 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(50) - 17 Feb 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(51) - 17 Feb 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(48) - 12 Feb 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(49) - 12 Feb 2016

Office Report

Click to view

Order(46) - 13 Jan 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(47) - 13 Jan 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(44) - 1 Dec 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(45) - 1 Dec 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(42) - 5 Nov 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(43) - 5 Nov 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(40) - 6 Oct 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(41) - 6 Oct 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(38) - 4 Sept 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(39) - 4 Sept 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(36) - 21 Jul 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(37) - 21 Jul 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(35) - 14 Jul 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(34) - 13 May 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(32) - 31 Mar 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(33) - 31 Mar 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(30) - 17 Dec 2014

ROP

Click to view

Order(31) - 17 Dec 2014

Judgment

Click to view

Order(27) - 10 Nov 2014

ROP

Click to view

Order(28) - 10 Nov 2014

Office Report

Click to view

Order(29) - 10 Nov 2014

ROP

Click to view

Order(25) - 17 Oct 2014

ROP

Click to view

Order(26) - 17 Oct 2014

ROP

Click to view

Order(23) - 16 Oct 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(24) - 16 Oct 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(21) - 23 Sept 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(22) - 23 Sept 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(20) - 20 Aug 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(19) - 4 Aug 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(18) - 3 Feb 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(17) - 25 Oct 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(16) - 18 Oct 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(15) - 23 Aug 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(14) - 2 Aug 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(13) - 16 Jul 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(12) - 8 May 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(11) - 7 May 2013

ROP

Click to view

Order(9) - 10 Apr 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(10) - 10 Apr 2013

ROP

Click to view

Order(8) - 3 Apr 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(7) - 2 Apr 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(6) - 4 Mar 2013

ROP

Click to view

Order(5) - 23 Feb 2011

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(4) - 22 Nov 2010

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(3) - 4 Oct 2010

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(2) - 9 Feb 2010

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(1) - 20 Jul 2009

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view
Similar Case Search

Lawyers

Search in District Courts Data