Kshir Sagar Patel vs. State Of Chattisgarh Chief Secretary
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Fixed Date by Court
Before:
Hon'ble Adarsh Kumar Goel, Hon'ble Hon'Ble The Chief Justice
Stage:
AFTER NOTICE (FOR ADMISSION) - CRIMINAL CASES
Remarks:
Dismissed
Listed On:
22 Sept 2017
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Interlocutory Applications:
42685/2017,42686/2017,55089/2017,
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
TTEM NO. $59$
COURT NO.11
SECTION $TT-C$
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 4304/2017
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 01-05-2017 in MCRA No. 3070/2017 passed by the High Court Of Chhatisgarh At Bilaspur)
KSHIR SAGAR PATEL
Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
STATE OF CHATTISGARH
Respondent(s)
(FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS -IA 42685/2017 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. -IA 42686/2017 and IA No.55089/2017-INTERVENTION APPLICATION)
Date : 22-09-2017 These matters were called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT
For Petitioner(s) | Mr. Sidharth Luthra, Sr. Adv. | |
---|---|---|
Mr. Abhay Kumar, AOR | ||
Mr. Peeyush Bhatia, Adv. | ||
Mr. Himanshu, Adv. | ||
Mr. Saurabh Mishra, Adv. | ||
For Respondent(s) Mr. Tushar Mehta, ASG | ||
Mr. Atul Jha, Adv. | ||
Mr. Sandeep Jha, Adv. | ||
Mr. Dharmendra Kumar Sinha, AOR | ||
Mr. Sanjay Hegde, Sr. Adv. | ||
Mr. Pukhrambam Ramesh Kumar, Adv. | ||
Mr. Uday Manaktala, Adv. | ||
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following |
ORDER
We have heard learned counsel for the parties.
Not Verified Without expressing any opinion on merits of the case but $\frac{7}{6}$ $\frac{1}{6}$ $\frac{1}{8}$ $\frac{1}{8}$ $\frac{1}{8}$ $\frac{1}{8}$ $\frac{1}{8}$ $\frac{1}{8}$ $\frac{1}{8}$ $\frac{1}{8}$ $\frac{1}{8}$ $\frac{1}{8}$ $\frac{1}{8}$ $\frac{1}{8}$ $\frac{1}{8}$ $\frac{1}{8}$ $\frac{1}{8}$ $\frac{1}{8}$ $\frac{1}{8}$ $\frac{1}{8}$ $\frac{1}{8}$ $\frac{1}{8}$ already been in custody, the petitioner is granted bail to the satisfaction of the trial Court.
The special leave petition is, accordingly, disposed of. Pending application(s), including application for intervention, shall also stand disposed of.
(MAHABIR SINGH) (PARVEEN KUMARI PASRICHA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER