The State Of Madhya Pradesh Transport Department Secretary vs. Subhash Sona

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M K HANJURA Civil Appeal No(s). 853/2011 STATE OF M.P.& ORS.

VERSUS

SUBHASH SONA & ORS.

WITH $SLP(C)$ No. 3937/2011 (With Office Report)

Date: 18/02/2015 This appeal was called on for hearing today.

For Appellant(s)

Ms. Vibha Datta Makhija, Adv.

Mr. B. S. Banthia, Adv.

For Respondent(s)

Mr. M. C. Dhingra, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following ORDER

The office report is that Ld.counsel for the appellants and the Ld.counsel for the respondents have failed to file the statement of case, although they have been notified to do so by notice dated 27.07.2011 of this Registry. Order XIX Rule 32 of the Supreme Court Rules, 2013 provides that if the appellant does not file a statement of case within the time, as provided for in sub rule (1), it shall be presumed that the appellant has adopted the list of dates/synopsis containing chronology of events as filed at the time of presentation of petition for seeking special leave appeal(SLP)/appeal, as statement of case, and does not desire to 16.41:E^ISle any further statement of case. The order further provides that if the respondent has entered appearance and does not file a

$\dots \ldots \ldots 2$

SECTION IV

REGISTRAR COURT. 2

ITEM NO.97

Appellant(s)

$Respondent(s)$

statement of case within the time, as provided in Sub Rule(1) (i.e. 35 days) it shall be presumed that he does not desire to lodge the same.

In view of the rule position cited above, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court under the rules.

(M K HANJURA) Registrar

SB