Perumatty Grama Panchayat vs. The State Of Kerala Local Self Government Secretary
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
19 Apr 2010
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
SECTION XIA
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M K HANJURA
Civil Appeal No(s). 4033/2009
PERUMATTY GRAMA PANCHAYAT
ITEM NO.91
Appellant(s)
$Respondent(s)$
VERSUS
STATE OF KERALA & ORS.
| WITH | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C.A. No. 4034/2009 | ||||
| C.A. No. $4035/2009$ | ||||
| C.A. No. 4036/2009 | ||||
| C.A. No. 4037/2009 | ||||
| C.A. No. 3538-3539/2010 | ||||
| C.A. No. $3540/2010$ | ||||
| C.A. No. 3541/2010 | ||||
| (With Interim Relief and Office Report) |
Date : $15/01/2015$ This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr. A. Raghunath, Adv. Mr. M. T. George, Adv. Mr. P. V. Dinesh, Adv. Mr. Romy Chacko, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. M. T. George, Adv. Mr.Govind Jee, adv. Mr. Prashant Bhushan, Adv. Mr. Romy Chacko, Adv. Mr.Siddhanth Kochar, adv. M/s Suresh A. Shroff & Co., Adv. Ms.Shomona Khanna, adv. Mr.Nikhil Nayyar, adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following ORDER
Instruct of the office is that the Ld.counsel for the appellant in a $M$ $M$ $M$ $M$ $M$ $M$ $S$ S.A.Shroff & Co. appearing for some of the $M$ .No.4033/09 and $M$ /s S.A.Shroff & Co. appearing for some of the respondents in all the matters have already filed the statement of case.
$\dots\dots\dots\dots2$
The office report proceeds to state that some of the appellants and the respondents have failed to file the statement of case within the period provided in the order dated 7.11.2012 of the Hon'ble Judge in Chamber. Order XIX Rule 32 of the Supreme Court Rules,2013 provides that if the appellant does not file a statement of case within the time, as provided for in sub rule (1), it shall be presumed that the appellant has adopted the list of dates/synopsis containing chronology of events as filed at the time of presentation of petition for seeking special leave to appeal(SLP)/appeal, as statement of case,and does not desire to file any further statement of case. The order further provides that if the respondent has entered appearance and does not file a statement of case within the time, as provided in Sub Rule(1) (i.e. 35 days) it shall be presumed that he does not desire to lodge the same.
In view of the rule position cited above, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court under the rules.
(M K HANJURA) Registrar
SB