High Court Of Judicature For The State Of Telangana At Hyderabad vs. J. Nagabhushana Reddy
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Fixed Date by Court
Stage:
SERVICE/COMPLIANCE-BEFORE REGISTRAR(J)
Remarks:
List Before Chamber
Listed On:
19 May 2022
In:
Registrar
Category:
UNKNOWN
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 11740/2020 HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
K. BALARAMA RAJU & ORS.
Respondent $(s)$
([ONLY SLP (C) NOS.8833-8841 OF 2021 IS TO BE LISTED])
WITH SLP(C) No. 8833-8841/2021 (XII-A)
Date: 10-02-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. SUNDRESH [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Ms. Uttara Babbar, AOR Ms. Christi Jain, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. D. Bharat Kumar, Adv. Mr. Aman Shukla, Adv. Mr. Rahul G. Tanwani, Adv.
Mr. Chalasani Venkat, Adv. Mr. M. Chandrakanth Reddy, Adv.
Mr. Gopal Jha, AOR
Ms. Uttara Babbar, AOR
Mr. Upendra Mishra, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR
Ms. Christi Jain, AOR Mr. S.. Udaya Kumar Sagar, AOR
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following $0 R D E R$
Counsel for the petitioner submits that there is discrepancy between old and new office reports. The old office report Signal includes that service is complete on Respondent nos. 1 to 5 and 7 Service is incomplete in respect of Respondent nos. 8 to 14 12.56.1618<br>Reas WHereas new office report says otherwise in respect of Respondent $no.2.$
COURT NO.7
The Registry is directed to verify the aforesaid and do the needful.
Four weeks' time is granted to the counsel for the petitioner to serve the unserved Respondents in terms of latest office report dated 8.2.2023.
(DR. NAVEEN RAWAL) (MALEKAR NAGARAJ) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS BRANCH OFFICER
-2-