High Court Of Judicature For The State Of Telangana At Hyderabad vs. J. Nagabhushana Reddy
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Fixed Date by Court
Stage:
SERVICE/COMPLIANCE-BEFORE REGISTRAR(J)
Remarks:
List Before Chamber
Listed On:
19 May 2022
In:
Registrar
Category:
UNKNOWN
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
$\mathbf{1}$
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR [IN CHAMBER] Mr. Yogit Kamat, Adv. Ms. Christi Jain, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. D. Bharat Kumar, Adv. Mr. Aman Shukla, Adv. Mr. M. Chandrakanth Reddy, Adv. Mr. Amit Kumar, Adv. Mr. Gopal Jha, AOR Ms. Uttara Babbar, AOR Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Ms. Christi Jain, AOR Mr. I.V. Kasyap, Adv. Mr. K. Vasudevarao, Adv. Mr. M. Venkat Muralidhar, Adv. Mr. Ch. Appalaraju, Adv. Mr. G. Anil Kumar, Adv. Mr. N. Narasimha Murthy, Adv. Mr. Dasari Muralee Mohan, Adv. Mr. Kashapogu Suresh, Adv. Ms. Aswathi M.K., AOR Mr. Sri Harsha Peechara, Adv. Mr. Duvvuri Subrahmanva Bhanu, Adv.
K. BALARAMA RAJU & ORS.
([ONLY SLP (C) NOS.8833-8841 OF 2021 IS TO BE LISTED])
WITH
SLP(C) No. 8833-8841/2021 (XII-A)
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
Date: 08-12-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
For Petitioner(s) Ms. Uttara Babbar, AOR
ITEM NO.1715
COURT NO.14
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 11740/2020
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
VFRSUS
SECTION XII-A
Respondent $(s)$
Petitioner(s)
Ms. Kriti Sinha, Adv. Ms. Pallavi, Adv. Mr. Akshat Kulshreshtha, Adv. Mr. Rajiv Kumar Choudhry, AOR
UPON hearing the counsel, the Court made the following O R D E R
SLP(C) No. 8833-8841/2021
IA No. 253959 of 2023
By way of this application, condonation of the delay of two days in filing spare copies is sought. The delay is condoned.
Application is accordingly ordered.
Registry is directed to take necessary steps to effect service upon respondent No. 1 in SLP (C) Nos. 8833 and 8834 of 2021.
IA No. 247777 of 2023
By way of this application, the applicant seeks deletion of the name of respondent No. 2, who is the same, in all nine matters. At the risk and peril of the applicant, this prayer is accepted. Application is accordingly ordered permitting the deletion of the name of respondent No. 2 from the array of parties in all nine matters.
Amended Memos of Parties shall be filed within four weeks.
(KAPIL TANDON) (NIDHI WASON)
COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)