Ashok Kumar And Ors Etc. Etc vs. The State Of Jammu And Kashmir Law Department Through Principal Secretary To Government
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
LISTED ON : 29.08.2016 COURT NO. : R2 ITEM No. : 112
SECTION XVIA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) Nos. 13607610 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF
ASHOK KUMAR & ORS. ETC. ETC. ....Petitioners
STATE OF J & K & ORS. .....Respondents
OFFICE REPORT
VERSUS
The Special Leave Petition above mentioned was listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court on 18th July, 2016 when he was pleased to pass the following Order:
"SLP(C) No. 13607/2016
Mr. Puneeth K.G., Ld. Advocate has appeared on behalf of the respondent No. 1. He seeks and is given two weeks time to file the vakalatnama and four weeks time to file the counter affidavit.
Ld. Counsel for the Respondent No.2 had accepted notice before the Hon'ble Court on 13.5.2016 but has failed to file the vakalatnama. The same shall be reported to the Hon'ble Court as and when the matter will be listed.
The served respondents shall be at liberty to file the counter affidavit within a period of four weeks.
SLP(C) Nos.13608,13609 and 13610 of 2016
Respondent No.1 in SLP(C) Nos.13608/ 2016,Respondent No.2 in SLP(C) No.13609/2016 and 13610/2016 accepted notice before the Hon'ble Court on 13.5.2016 but has failed to file the vakalatnama. The same shall be reported to the Hon'ble Court as and when the matter will be listed.
Await the return of the service of notice already issued to the other respondents.
List again on 29.8.2016."
S.NO. | SLP NOS. | REMARKS |
---|---|---|
1. | SLP (c) No. 13607 OF 2016 | It is submitted that Mr. Puneeth K.G., Advocate though<br>appeared on behalf of Respondent no. 1 but has not filed<br>Vakalatnama and Memo of appearance on his behalf so far. |
It is further submitted that Mr. Anupam Raina, Advocate though<br>accepted notice on behalf of Respondent no. 2 but has not filed<br>Vakalatnama and Memo of appearance on his behalf till date. | ||
It is also submitted that Mr. R.P. Gupta and Mr. D. Mahesh<br>Babu, Advocate for Respondent nos. 4, 6, 7 and 3, 5 have not<br>filed Counter affidavit till date. | ||
It is submitted that neither A.D. card nor unserved cover<br>containing the notice has been received back from Respondent<br>no. 1.<br>Service of notice is not complete on Respondent no. 1 and 2. | ||
2. | SLP (c) No. 13608 of 2016 | There are 4 respondents in the matter. Respondent No. 1 is<br>common Respondent No. 2 in SLP (C) No. 13607 of 2016. |
It is submitted that notices were issued to Respondent Nos. 2 to<br>4 through Regd. A.D. Post on 25052016. | ||
It is further submitted that neither A.D. Card nor unserved cover<br>containing the said notice has been received back from<br>Respondents Nos. 1 to 4. | ||
3. | SLP (C) No. 13609 of 2016 | There are 4 Respondents in the matter. Respondent No. 2 is<br>common respondent No. 2 in SLP (C) No. 13607 of 2016. |
It is submitted that notices were issued to Respondent Nos. 1, 3<br>& 4 through Regd. A.D. Post on 25052016. | ||
It is further submitted neither A.D. Card nor unserved cover<br>containing the said notice has been received back from<br>Respondent Nos. 1 to 4. | ||
4. | SLP (C) No. 13610 of 2016 | There are 10 respondents in the matter. Respondent No. 2 is<br>common Respondent No. 2 in SLP (C) No. 13607 of 2016.<br>It is submitted that notices were issued to Respondent Nos. 1<br>& 3 to 10 through Regd. A.D. Post on 25052016. |
It is further submitted neither A.D. Card nor unserved cover<br>containing the said notice has been received back from<br>Respondent Nos. 1 &3 to 10 | ||
Service of notice is not complete on Respondent Nos.<br>Respondent Nos. 1 to 10 . |