Gayatrinagar Cooperative Housing Society Ltd vs. Harshit Indravadan Talati
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Fixed Date by Court
Before:
Hon'ble Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Hon'ble Hemant Gupta
Stage:
DISPOSAL/FINAL DISPOSAL AT ADMISSION STAGE - CIVIL CASES
Remarks:
List On (Date) [27-07-2021]
Listed On:
7 Jul 2021
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.15 Court 7 (Video Conferencing) SECTION III
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.14062/2018
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 28-03-2018 in SCA No.75/2018 passed by the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad)
ASIM PANDYA Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
JALARAM LAND DEVELOPERS & ORS. Respondent(s)
WITH
- SLP(C) No. 11336/2018 (III)
- SLP(C) No. 11347-11349/2018 (III)
- SLP(C) No. 11352-11354/2018 (III)
- SLP(C) No. 11261/2018 (III)
- SLP(C) No. 11365-11367/2018 (III)
- SLP(C) No. 10896/2018 (III)
Date : 07-07-2021 This petition was called on for hearing today.
- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA
- For Petitioner(s) Mr. E. C. Agrawala, AOR
Mr. Purvish Jitendra Malkan, AOR
For Respondent(s) Mr. Anshin Desai, Sr. Adv. Mr. Pradhuman Gohil, Adv. Mrs.Taruna Singh Gohil, AOR Ms. Ranu Purohit, Adv. Ms. Tanya Srivastava, Adv. Ms. Jasleen Bindra, Adv.
Mr. Kailash Pandey, Adv.
Mr. Ranjeet Singh, Adv. Mr. Gaichangpou Gangmei, AOR Mr. Shubhranshu Padhi, AOR Mr. Rahul Gupta, AOR Mr. Purvish Jitendra Malkan, Adv. Ms. Sumita Ray, Adv. Mr. E.C. Agrawala, Adv. Mr. Taruna Singh Gohil, Adv. Mr. Shubhranshu Padhi, Adv. Mr. Rahul Gupta, Adv. Ms. Garima Prashad, AOR Ms. Ranjeeta Rohatgi, AOR Mr. Gaurav Agrawal, AOR Mr. Shiv Mangal Sharma, Adv. Mr. Parth J. Contractor, Adv. Mr. Rohit Yadav, Adv. Ms. Shalini Singh, Adv. Ms. Sara Chanda, Adv. M/S. Aura & Co., AOR
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
We have pointed out to learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner was supposed to point out the alternative interim arrangement considering that normally this Court would loath to interfere with interim order dated 25.2.2000. The same has not been complied with.
Last opportunity is granted to comply with the same within a week, by way of an alternative arrangement, failing which, we will presume that the petitioner is not interest in prosecuting the matter.
List on 27th July, 2021.
(RASHMI DHYANI) (POONAM VAID) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER