Gianwati vs. The State Of Haryana Through Chief Secretary
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
FRESH
Before:
Hon'ble Hon'Ble The Chief Justice, Hon'ble Krishna Murari, Hon'ble Hima Kohli
Stage:
FRESH (FOR ADMISSION) - CRIMINAL CASES
Listed On:
14 Jul 2022
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.22 COURT NO.1 SECTION II-B
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) Diary No.15834/2022
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04-07-2011 in CRLA No. 27/2000 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh)
GIANWATI Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
THE STATE OF HARYANA THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY Respondent(s)
(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.85827/2022-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.85828/2022-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT )
Date : 14-07-2022 This petition was called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
Digitally signed by Rajni Mukhi Date: 2022.07.16 10:37:22 IST Reason:
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA MURARI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI
| For Petitioner(s) | Mr. Parminder Singh Bhullar, AOR |
|---|---|
| Mr. Shafiq Khan, Adv. | |
| Ms. Sundri, Adv. | |
For Respondent(s)
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
-
- Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and perused the material placed on record.
-
- This petition for Special Leave to Appeal is accompanied by an application for condonation of 3165 days delay in filing the same. The only ground offered in para 3 of the application is that the applicant and her husband who are co-accused in a Signature Not Verified
case of dacoity, were enlarged on bail in the year 2000 and she remained unaware about the status of the appeal that was pending before the High Court.
-
- We see no justification for condoning the inordinate delay of 3165 days in preferring the present petition. Even otherwise, there is no merit in the case. The High Court has already modified the sentence imposed on the petitioner by reducing it from three years to one and a half years.
-
- The Petition for Special Leave to Appeal is accordingly dismissed on the ground of delay as also on merits.
(RAJNI MUKHI) (R.S. NARAYANAN) COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)
2