eCourtsIndia

The State Of Madhya Pradesh Ujjain Development Authority And Anr. Thr. Its Secretary/Ceo vs. Satya Narayan Somani& Ors.

Court:Supreme Court of India, New Delhi
Judge:Hon'ble Jagdish Singh Khehar
Case Status:Allowed
Order Date:9 Aug 2016
CNR:SCIN010156932016

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Text

LISTING ON 09.08.2016 COURT NO. 1 ITEM NO. 16

SEC.IVA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

PETITIONS FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NOS. 7116, 8145 & 13455 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF

M/S. AJAR ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD. ETC. ...PETITIONERS Versus-SATYANARAYAN SOMANI AND ORS. ...RESPONDENTS

OFFICE REPORT

SLP Nos.7116, 8145 OF 2016

The matters above mentioned were listed before Hon'ble Court on 19.04.2016 with office report dated 18.04.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order:

"Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondents No. 1, 2 and 4 are granted four weeks' finally to file their counter affidavits. Rejoinder, if any, be filed within two weeks thereafter.

Post on 09.08.2016. "

SLP No. 7116/2016

It is submitted that there are eight respondents in the matter above mentioned. Mr. Arvind Kumar, Advocate (Caveator) on behalf of respondent nos. 1 and 2 is permitted to retire by the Hon'ble Court vide its order dated 18.03.2016. Now, Mr. Karunakar Mahalik, Advocate has filed vakalatnama/appearance on behalf of Respondent Nos. 1 & 2 and also filed counter affidavit of Respondent Nos. 1 & 2. The counter affidavit is being circulated with this office report. Mr. C.D. Singh, Advocate has filed vakalatnama/appearance on behalf of Respondent No. 3 but no counter affidavit is filed, so far. Mr. Arjun Garg, Advocate has filed counter affidavit on behalf of Respondent Nos. 4 & 5 and same has already been included in the SLP paper books. No one has entered appearance on behalf of Respondent Nos. 68, though served by way of dasti service by counsel for the petitioner.

Service of show cause notice is complete.

SLP No. 8145/2016

It is submitted that there are nine respondents in the matter above mentioned. Mr. Arvind Kumar, Advocate (Caveator) on behalf of respondent nos. 1 and 2 is permitted to retire by the Hon'ble Court vide its order dated 18.03.2016. Now, Mr. Karunakar Mahalik, Advocate has filed vakalatnama/appearance on behalf of Respondent Nos. 1 & 2. Mr. Arjun Garg, Advocate on behalf of Respondent No. 4, Mr. C.D. Singh on behalf of Respondent Nos. 3, 58 filed vakalatnama/appearance but no counter affidavit has been filed by any of the counsel, so far. No one has entered appearance on behalf of Respondent No. 9, though served by way of dasti service. Service of show cause notice is complete.

SLP No. 13455/2016

The matter above mentioned was listed before Hon'ble Court on 13.05.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order:

"Issue notice. Tag with S.L.P. (C) No.7116 of 2016. At this stage, Mr. Kartik Seth, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.1 and 2. Notice shall now be issued to remaining respondents only."

Accordingly, show cause notice was issued to Respondent Nos. 37 through Registered AD Post on 21.06.2016. Mr. Arvind Kumar, Advocate (Caveator) on behalf of respondent nos. 1 and 2 is permitted to retire by the Hon'ble Court vide its order dated 18.03.2016. Now, Mr. Karunakar Mahalik, Advocate has filed vakalatnama/appearance on behalf of Respondent Nos. 1 & 2.

Neither AD Cards nor unserved covers have been received in respect of Respondent Nos. 37.

Service of show cause notice is not complete on Respondent Nos. 37.

The matters above mentioned are listed before the Hon'ble Court with this Office Report.

Dated this the 8th day of August, 2016.

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

Copy to: Mr. Senthil Jagadeesan, Advocate Mr. Arvind Kumar, Advocate Ms. Liz Mathew, Advocate Mr. Arjun Garg, Advocate

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(32) - 24 Aug 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(33) - 24 Aug 2017

Judgement - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(31) - 14 Aug 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(30) - 10 Aug 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(29) - 9 Aug 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(28) - 4 Aug 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(27) - 13 Jul 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(26) - 12 Jul 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(25) - 11 Jul 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(24) - 19 May 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(23) - 18 May 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(20) - 5 May 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(21) - 5 May 2017

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(22) - 5 May 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(19) - 18 Apr 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(16) - 20 Mar 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(17) - 20 Mar 2017

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(18) - 20 Mar 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(13) - 23 Feb 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(14) - 23 Feb 2017

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(15) - 23 Feb 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(12) - 25 Oct 2016

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(10) - 9 Aug 2016

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(11) - 9 Aug 2016

Office Report - of Main Case

Viewing

Order(7) - 13 May 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(8) - 13 May 2016

Office Report

Click to view

Order(9) - 13 May 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(4) - 19 Apr 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(5) - 19 Apr 2016

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(6) - 19 Apr 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(1) - 18 Mar 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(2) - 18 Mar 2016

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(3) - 18 Mar 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view