Ferro Concrete Construction (India) Pvt. Ltd vs. Tungabhadra Board

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble Bela M. Trivedi
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:15 Apr 2024
CNR:SCIN010156352024

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

FRESH

Before:

Hon'ble Bela M. Trivedi, Hon'ble Pankaj Mithal

Stage:

FRESH (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES

Remarks:

Dismissed

Listed On:

15 Apr 2024

In:

Judge

Category:

UNKNOWN

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

Date: 2024.04.16

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).8401-8402/2024

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 20-03-2024 in WA No.100566/2023 and WA No.100567/2023 passed by the High Court of Karnataka Circuit Bench at Dharwad)

FERRO CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION (INDIA) PVT. LTD. Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

TUNGABHADRA BOARD & ORS. Respondent(s)

(IA No.85793/2024-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.85792/2024-PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHY LIST OF DATES)

Date : 15-04-2024 These petitions were called on for hearing today.

  • CORAM : HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE BELA M. TRIVEDI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ MITHAL
  • For Petitioner(s) Mr. Siddharth Dave, Sr. Adv. Ms. Vidhi Thaker, Adv. Mr. Saurav Rajurkar, Adv. Mr. Vinayak Mehrotra, AOR
  • For Respondent(s) Mr. D. Seshadri Naidu, Sr. Adv. Mr. Kumar Sudeep, AOR

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

1. Heard learned senior counsel, Mr. Siddharth Dave for the petitioner.

2. We are not inclined to interfere with the impugned order passed by the High Court, more particularly, when the work order has already been issued to the respondent No.3 and the project work has already started. Digitally signed by RAVI ARORA Signature Not Verified

3. It is clarified that we have not expressed any opinion on the qualification/disqualification, much less the experience 10:11:04 IST Reason:

1

certificate issued in favour of the respondent No.3. It will be open for the petitioner to take recourse to any other remedy, as may be available under the law.

4. Subject to the above, both the Special Leave Petitions stand dismissed.

5. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.

(RAVI ARORA) (MAMTA RAWAT)

COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)