Central Bureau Of Investigation vs. B. Appalanarasamma (Dead) Through Lrs
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Ordinary
Before:
Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar
Stage:
DIRECTION MATTERS
Remarks:
List After (Weeks) [4]
Listed On:
22 Feb 2024
In:
Chamber
Category:
UNKNOWN
Interlocutory Applications:
112612/2023,267052/2023,267054/2023,1163/2024,
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
<u>Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 8870/2023</u>
CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Petitioner(s)
Respondent $(s)$
VERSUS
B. APPALANARASAMMA & ORS.
(IA No. 267052/2023 - APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION IA No. 267054/2023 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING SUBSTITUTION APPLN. IA No. 112612/2023 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT
IA No. 1163/2024 - SETTING ASIDE AN ABATEMENT)
Date: 22-02-2024 These matters were called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR [IN CHAMBER]
- For Petitioner(s) Mr. Amit Sharma, Adv. Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria, AOR
- For Respondent(s) Ms. Arti Anupriya, AOR Mr. Sumit Batra, Adv. Mr. Vineet Kumar Yadav, Adv. Ms. Nirmala Singh, Adv. Mr. Kartikey, Adv. Mr. Paras Juneja, Adv. Mr. Ravinder Kumar Yadav, Adv. Mr. Vinav Mohan Sharma, Adv. Mr. Chandan Jha, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel, the Court made the following O R D E R
Mr. Amit Sharma, learned counsel, appearing for the petitioner - Central Bureau of Investigation, seeks some time to examine the issue in the context of deceased respondent No.1, who seems to have expired after the delivery of the judgment by the High Court, and $\mathbf{z}$ e an appropriate application.
List after four weeks.
(BABITA PANDEY) COURT MASTER (SH)
(VIDYA NEGI) ASSISTANT REGISTRAR