Human Rights Union Of S. Court Lawyers vs. Manohar Joshi

¨ 1 ITEM NO.101 COURT NO.1 SECTION PIL SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO(s). 527 OF 1998 ACTION COMM.FOR IMP.OF SRIKRISHNA R.&ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUS U.O.I. & ORS Respondent(s) (With appln(s) for recalling the court's order dt. 12.9.03 and for listing of the matters for final disposal at any early date and office report) WITH W.P(C) NO. 164 of 1999,W.P(C) NO. 182 of 2001 W.P(C) NO. 40 of 1999,W.P(C) NO. 542 of 1998 (With appln. for recalling the ct's order) Date: 01/08/2007 These Petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.V.RAVEENDRAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DALVEER BHANDARI For Petitioner(s) Mr. Colin Gonsalves, Sr. Adv. Mr. Vipin M. Benjamin, Adv. Ms. Neeru Vaid, Adv.(NP) Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta, Adv. Dr.Rajiv Dhawan, Sr.Adv. Mr. Anis Suhrawardy,Adv. Mrs.Shamama Anis, Adv. Mr.Syed Mehdi Imam, Adv. Dr. Nafis A. Siddiqui, Adv.(NP) Mr. Shakil Ahmed Syed, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Amendra Sharan, ASG Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Adv. Mr. Gautam Narayan, Adv. For Mr. P. Parmeswaran, Adv. Ms. Binu Tamta ,Adv(NP) 2 Mr.Y.H.Muchhhala, Adv. Mr. Huzefa Ahmadi, Adv. Mr. Ejaz Maqbool ,Adv Ms. Hansa Advani, Adv. Ms. Taruna Singh, Adv. Mr. Abhijit Sinha, Adv. Mr.Pardhuman Gohil, Adv. 3

Mr.Shekhar Nafade, Sr.Adv. Mr. Ravindra Adsure, Adv. For Mr. V.N. Raghupathy ,Adv

Mr. Shivaji M. Jadhav, Adv.(NP)

UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following ORDER

The State has filed a detailed report giving out the steps taken on the basis of the Shri Krishna Commission Report. It appears that the petitioners in these various writ petitions are aggrieved and according to them still the State has not taken the appropriate action which is required under law.

The various petitioners shall file a joint affidavit within a period of six weeks giving out the failure, if any, on the part of the State in implementing the report of the Committee. The affidavit shall also indicate whether there was any failure on the part of the State in registering the cases and in investigating the cases or whether public prosecutor has not been appointed by the State or the State has failed to take any appropriate action which ought to have been taken by the State under the law. These cases may be classified into various groups so that this Court can issue further appropriate directions.

The advocates on record are permitted to inspect the records and relevant copies may be furnished to them.

List in the last week of October, 2007.

(G.V.Ramana) (Veera Verma) Court Master Court Master