Phoenix Arc Private Limited vs. Navneet Jain

ITEM NO.4 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XVII

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. S.P.S. LALER

Civil Appeal No(s). 2809/2021

PHOENIX ARC PRIVATE LIMITED Appellant(s)

VERSUS

NAVNEET JAIN & ORS. Respondent(s)

WITH

• C.A. No. 4590/2021 (XVII)
• C.A. No. 4667/2021 (XVII)
• C.A. No. 4668/2021 (XVII)

Date : 04-11-2022 These appeals were called on for hearing today.

For Appellant(s) Ms. Jayasree Narasimhan, AOR Ms. Misha Rohatgi, AOR Mr. Gaurav Agrawal, AOR Ms./Mr. Ripul Swati,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ajay Kumar Talesara, AOR Ms. Jayasree Narasimhan, AOR Mr. Suresh Dutt Dobhal, AOR Mr. Ripul Swati,Adv. Mr. Vishal Tiwari,Adv. Mr. Sandeep,Adv. Mr. Sunil Prakash Pandey,Adv. Digitally signed by MADHU GROVER Date: 2022.11.05 13:34:45 IST Reason: Signature Not Verified

Mr. Vikrant Y.S. Narula,Adv. Mr. Kaushal Kishore,Addv.

Mr. S.C. V. Vimal Pani,Adv. Mr. Devash Srivastava,Adv. Ms. Misha Rohatgi, AOR

UPON hearing the counsel through Video Conference, the Court made the following

O R D E R

C.A. No. 2809/2021

Four weeks time, as last chance is granted to respondent No. 1 to file the counter affidavit.

Service is deemed complete on Respondent Nos. 2 and 4, as both are common respondents in C.A. No. 4667/2021 and duly served therein.

Respondent Nos. 5 and 6 submits that they are appellant in C.A. Nos. 4667 and 4668/2021 wherein they have challenged the same impugned order and therefore, they do not wish to file counter affidavit in this matter.

Respondent No. 3 submits that he has already filed the vakalatnama. He further submits that he is appellant in C.A. No. 4590/2021 wherein he has challenged the same impugned order and therefore, he does wish to file counter affidavit in this matter.

After expiry of four weeks, the matter be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court, as per rules.

C.A. No. 4590/2021

Service of notice is complete on respondent Nos. 3 and 4 but no one has entered appearance on their behalf.

Respondent No. 4 submits that he is appellant in C.A. No. 2809/2021 wherein he has challenged the same impugned order and he does not wish to file vakalatnama and counter affidavit in this matter. His statement is taken on record.

Four weeks time, as last chance is granted to respondent No. 1 to file the counter affidavit.

Service is deemed complete on Respondent No. 2 as he is Respondent No.2 in C.A. No. 4667/2021 and duly served therein.

After expiry of four weeks, the matter be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court, as per rules.

C.A. Nos. 4667 and 4668/2021

The office report indicates that service of notice is complete on respondent Nos. 2 to 4 but no one has entered appearance on their behalf.

Ld. Counsel for Respondent No. 3 submits that he is appellant in C.A. No. 4590/2021 wherein he has challenged the same impugned order. Ld. Counsel submits that he does not wish to file vakalatnama and counter affidavit in this matter. His statement is taken on record.

Four weeks time, as last chance is granted to respondent No. 1 to file the counter affidavit.

Ld. Counsel for Respondent No. 5 submits that he has already filed the vakalatnama. Ld. Counsel for respondent further submits that he is appellant in C.A. No. 2809/2021 and does not wish to file counter affidavit on behalf of respondent No.5.

After expiry of four weeks, the matters be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court, as per rules.

S.P.S. LALER Registrar

MG