Jai Bhagwan vs. The State Of Haryana Collector
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
FRESH
Before:
Hon'ble Adarsh Kumar Goel, Hon'ble Hon'Ble The Chief Justice
Stage:
FRESH (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES
Remarks:
List On (Date) [05-12-2017]
Listed On:
12 Apr 2017
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Interlocutory Applications:
118575/2017,118576/2017,118583/2017,118585/2017,118586/2017,
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.25 COURT NO.11 SECTION IV-B
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No(s). 15288/2017
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 23-01-2017 in RFA No. 710/2013 (O&M) RFA No. 711/2013(O&M) RFA No. 877/2012(O&M) RFA No. 99/2012(O&M) RFA No. 100/2012(O&M), RFA No, 2826 of 2012(O&M) RFA No. 2827/2012(O&M) RFA No. 707/2012(O&M) RFA No. 708/2012(O&M) RFA No. 709 of 2012(O&M) RFA No. 2567/2015(O&M), RFA No. 1083 of 2012 (O&M), RFA No. 1084 of 2012(O&M) and RFA No. 711/2012 (O&M) passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh)
JAI BHAGWAN & ETC.ETC. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
THE STATE OF HARYANA & ORS.ETC.ETC. Respondent(s) (FOR ADMISSION and IA No.118583/2017-APPLICATION FOR SETTING ASIDE ABATEMENT and IA No.118585/2017-APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION and IA No.118575/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE SLP/TP and IA No.118586/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING SUBSTITUTION APPLN. and IA No.118576/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING)
Date : 05-12-2017 These matters were called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
Digitally signed by MADHU BALA Date: 2017.12.06 16:40:18 IST Reason:
Signature Not Verified
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT
For Petitioner(s) Mr. Shubham Bhalla, AOR Ms. Roopam Rai,Adv.
For Respondent(s)
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners.
Permission to file SLP is granted.
Delay condoned.
Delay in filing substitution application is
condoned.
Substitution allowed.
Abatement, if any, is set aside.
We do not find any ground to interfere with the impugned order. The special leave petition(s) is, accordingly, dismissed.
Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
(MADHU BALA) (PARVEEN KUMARI PASRICHA) COURT MASTER (SH) BRANCH OFFICER