Sangli District Central Cooperative Bank Ltd vs. Union Of India

ITEM NO.70 + 33 COURT NO.6 SECTION X

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Writ Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 534/2017

PUNE DISTRICT CENTRAL COOPERATIVE BANK LTD. Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)

(FOR ADMISSION and IA No.57415/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IA No.57411/2017-APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS and IA No.31361/2018-CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION)

WITH W.P.(C) No. 601/2017 (X)

FOR [DIRECTION] ON IA 64239/2017) W.P.(C) No. 623/2017 (X)

FOR APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS ON IA 66112/2017) W.P.(C) No. 701/2017 (X)

FOR APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS ON IA 73859/2017) W.P.(C) No. 975/2017 (X)

FOR APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS ON IA 102912/2017 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 102913/2017)

W.P.(C) No. 216/2018 (X) (FOR ADMISSION and IA No.36868/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IA No.36866/2018-PERMISSION TO FILE APPLICATION FOR DIRECTION)

W.P.(C) No. 219/2018 (X)

W.P.(C) No. 225/2018. FOR ADMISSION AND IA NO. 39004/2018-STAY APPLICATION AND I.A. NO. 39008/2018 – EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

Date : 26-03-2018 These matters were called on for hearing today.

For Petitioner(s)	Mr. Parag Tripathi, Adv.
	Mr. Ravindra Keshavrao Adsure, AOR
	Ms. Himanshi Gupta, Adv.
	Mr. Sagar Pahune Patil, Adv.

Mr. A. Sundaram, SR. Adv. Mr. Subramoniam Prasad, AAG Mr. Vinodh Kanna B., AOR Mr. A. Sriram, Adv. Mr. Gopal Subramanian, Sr. Adv. Mr. H.P. Raval, Adv. Mr. Shivaji M. Jadhav, Adv. Mr. Brij Kishor Sah, Adv. Ms. Astha Deep, Adv. Mr. Nicholas Choudhury, Adv. M/S. S.M. Jadhav And Company, AOR Mr. Parag Tripathi, Adv. Mr. Nitin Gaware, Adv. Mr. Anand Landge, Adv. Mr. Jay Kishor Singh, AOR Mr. Satyajit A. Desai, Adv. Ms. Anagha S. Desai, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. P.S. Narsimha, ASG Mr. Ramesh Babu M. R., AOR Ms. Swati Setia, Adv. Ms. Manisha Singh, Adv. Mr. Arijit Prasad, Adv. Ms. Anil Katiyar, AOR

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

In all these cases filed by different Cooperative Banks, giving their own peculiar reasons because of which they were holding the money as on 08.11.2016. It is stated that almost in all these cases the Reserve Bank of India has even done KYC.

In view of the aforesaid, we are of the opinion that let the Reserve Bank of India file its response in each case within a period of two weeks.

Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) are praying for interim order with regard to Circular which has been issued by the NABARD.

2

For this purpose, the attendance of NABARD is necessary. We are informed NABARD has already been served but nobody has put in appearance on its behalf. Let standing counsel for NABARD be also served.

List the matters on 28.03.2018.

(ASHWANI THAKUR) (MALA KUMARI SHARMA) COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER