Inox Air Products Private Limited vs. Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble Sandeep Mehta
Case Status:Pending
Order Date:8 Nov 2024
CNR:SCIN010150972023

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

IA

Before:

Hon'ble Sandeep Mehta

Stage:

ORDERS (INCOMPLETE MATTERS / IAs / CRLMPs)

Remarks:

IA Allowed [212488/2024]

Listed On:

11 Aug 2024

In:

Chamber

Category:

UNKNOWN

Interlocutory Applications:

212488/2024,

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

COURT NO.14

SECTION XVII

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Civil Appeal No(s). 2853/2023

MAHINDRA CIE AUTOMOTIVE LIMITED

Appellant( $s$ )

VERSUS

MAHARASHTRA ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION & ORS.

Respondent(s)

(ONLY IA NO. 212495, 212488 AND 212227 OF 2024 TO BE LISTED IA No. 212495/2024 - ADDITION / DELETION / MODIFICATION PARTIES)

WITH

C.A. No. 3243/2023 (XVII)

(FOR ADDITION / DELETION / MODIFICATION PARTIES ON IA 212488/2024)

WITH

C.A. No.3239/2023 (XVII) (FOR ADDITION / DELETION / MODIFICATION PARTIES ON IA 212227/2024)

Date: 08-11-2024 These matters were called on for hearing today.

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA [IN CHAMBERS]

For Appellant(s)Ms. Dipali S. Sheth, Adv.
Mr. Nikunj Dayal, AOR
Mr. Pramod Dayal, Adv.
Mr. Shubham Mehta, Adv.

For Respondent(s) Mr. Anand Kumar Shrivastava, Adv. Ms. Ishita Jain, AOR Mr. Shivam Sinha, Adv. Mr. Ankit Bhandari, Adv.

Ms. Pratiti Rungta, Adv. Mr. S. K. Rungta, Sr. Adv. Mr. Sumit Pragal, Adv. Mr. Prashant Singh, Adv. Mr. Shivankur Shukla, Adv. Ms. Amita Singh Kalkal, AOR Ms. Lata Chauhan, Adv.

Samir Malik, AOR Mr. Nikita Choukse, Adv. Mr. Tushar Mathur, Adv.

Mr. Arjun Nanda, AOR Mr. Abhilash Verma, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

I.A. Ns. 212495, 212488 and 212227 of 2024

The applications filed by the counsel for the respondent to delete the name of the respondent no.5 from the array of parties.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has no objection to this application as the petitioner does not seek any relief against such respondent.

In this view of the matter, the applications seeking deletion of the name of the respondent no.5 are allowed and the said respondent is deleted from the array of parties.

Amended memo of parties be furnished within two weeks.

(GEETA JOSHI) (POOJA SHARMA) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT COURT MASTER (NSH)