Sonal Nikhil Shah vs. Nikhil Rasiklal Shah

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble N. Santosh Hegde
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:20 Jan 2005
CNR:SCIN010150802004

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Case Registered

Listed On:

30 Jul 2004

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

T.P.(C) No. 538 OF 2004 ITEM No.31 Court No. 2 SECTION XVIA A/N MATTER S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Transfer Petition.(Civil) No.538/2004 SONAL NIKHIL SHAH Petitioner (s) VERSUS NIKHIL RASIKLAL SHAH Respondent (s) (With Appln(s). for stay ) Date : 20/01/2005 This Petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N. SANTOSH HEGDE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.B. SINHA For Petitioner (s)Mr. Ramesh Chandra Mishra,Adv.(SCLSC) Dr. Meera Agarwal, Adv. Mr. R.B. Shami, Adv. For Respondent (s)Mr. E.C. Agrawala,Adv. Mr. Mahesh Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Rish Agrawal, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard learned counsel for the parties. The transfer petition is disposed of in terms of signed order. (PAWAN KUMAR) (PREM PRAKASH) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER (signed order is placed on the file) IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION TRANSFER PETITION (C) NO. 538 OF 2004 SONAL NIKHIL SHAH ... PETITIONER Versus NIKHIL RASIKLAL SHAH... RESPONDENT

O R D E R

´

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

We are informed by Mr. E.C. Agrawala, learned counsel appearing for the respondent-husband tha t the trial before the Chennai Court is at the concluding stage and only two remaining witnes ses shall be examined on one single day. Recording the said statement we dispose of this tra nsfer petition. We also direct that for the next date of hearing the respondent-husband will p ay Rs.3,000/- towards the petitioner-wife's travel expenses, if there is any other days are re quired for the petitioner to travel again the respondent-husband will pay her Rs.3,000/- for e ach trip provided the petitioner does not take any adjournment. Arrears if any towards the p ast maintenance shall be paid by the respondent husband.

With the above observations, this transfer petition is disposed of.

........................J. ( N. SANTOSH HEGDE )

........................J. ( S.B. SINHA ) NEW DELHI, JANUARY 20, 2005.

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(3) - 20 Jan 2005

ROP - of Main Case

Viewing

Order(2) - 4 Oct 2004

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(1) - 13 Aug 2004

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view