Nimesh Mehta vs. State Of Maharashtra

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).14460/2004

(From the judgement and order dated 07/07/2004 in WP No.2777/2004 of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT NAGPUR)

NIMESH MEHTA Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. Respondent(s)

(With prayer for interim relief and office report)

Date: 21/07/2006 This Petition was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.K. THAKKER

For Petitioner(s) Mr. P.H. Parekh,Adv.

for M/s. P.H. Parekh & Co.,Advs.

For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Keshavrao Adsure,Adv.

Mr. S.K. Nandy,Adv.

Mr. Rakesh Uttamchandra Upadhyay,Adv.

Mr. S.V. Deshpande,Adv.

Mr. Sanjay V. Kharde,Adv.

Ms. Chandan Ramamurthi,Adv.

UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

Mr. Rakesh Uttamchandra Upadhyay, learned counsel for Respondent No.3-A.I.C.T.E., states that he no longer represents A.I.C.T.E. and an intimation has been sent to his clients. Affidavit in terms of or der dated 14th February, 2005, has also not been filed. The learned counsel, however, has not filed an application seeking to withdraw from the case. Let that be done within two weeks.

...2/-

- 2 -

The A.I.C.T.E. is directed to file an affidavit in terms of order dated 14th February, 2005, and intimation be sent to it by the Registry. It is also directed to send a senior authorised officer to assist in the matter on the next date of hearing.

[ T.I. Rajput ] [ V.P. Tyagi ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Assistant Registrar