Gazi Salauddin Rehmatulla Hoole Alias Pardeshi Baba Trust vs. New Shree Swami Samartha Borivade Housing Company Private Limited
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Mention Memo
Before:
Hon'ble M.M. Sundresh, Hon'ble Rajesh Bindal
Stage:
FRESH (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES
Remarks:
Dismissed
Listed On:
25 Mar 2025
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Interlocutory Applications:
73564/2025,73565/2025,73573/2025,
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.42
COURT NO.8
SECTION IX
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) $No(s)$ . 8194/2025
[Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 10-03-2025 in CWP No. 6607/2024 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay]
GAZI SALAUDDIN REHMATULLA HOOLE ALIAS PARDESHI BABA TRUST
Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
NEW SHREE SWAMI SAMARTHA BORIVADE HOUSING COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS. Respondent $(s)$ IA No. 73573/2025 - DELETING THE NAME OF PETITIONER/RESPONDENT IA No. 73564/2025 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT IA No. 73565/2025 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.
Date: 25-03-2025 This matter was called on for hearing today.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. SUNDRESH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL
| For Petitioner(s) | Mr. Vinay Navare, Sr. Adv.<br>Mr. Sangramsingh R. Bhonsle, AOR<br>Mr. Siddharth Mehta, Adv.<br>Ms. Harshada Shrikhande, Adv.<br>Mr. Vaibhav Kaushish, Adv.<br>Ms. Bhargavi Mundhe, Adv.<br>Mr. Nrupal A. Dingankar, Adv.<br>Ms. Pushkara A. Bhonsle, Adv.<br>Mrs. Sneha S. Bhonsle, Adv.<br>Mr. Naman Sherstra, Adv.<br>Mr. Sanmitra Y. Pol, Adv. |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s)<br>Signature Not Verified<br>Digitally signed by<br>ASHA SUNDRIYA | Ms. Madhavi Diwan, Sr. Adv.<br>Mr. Shailesh Mahimtura, Adv.<br>Mr. Nilesh Tated, Adv.<br>Mr. Neelkamal Mishra, Adv.<br>Ms. Aandrita Deb, Adv.<br>Mr. Ishaan Zaveri, Adv.<br>Mr. Ananta Prasad Mishra, AOR |
| UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following<br>0 R D E R | |
| Application for deletion of proforma respondent |
Nos.5 to 10 is allowed at the risk of the petitioner.
We find no reason to interfere with the impugned order passed by the High Court.
The Special Leave Petition is, accordingly, dismissed.
Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
(ASHA SUNDRIYAL) (POONAM VAID)
DEPUTY REGISTRAR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR