Zile Singh Etc Etc vs. State Of Haryana

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR S.G. SHAH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).33164-33169/2009 MAHADEV ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s) (With office report ) Date: 23/07/2010 These Petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rohit Kumar Singh,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr Govind Goel, Adv. Mr Ambuj Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Mohan Lal Sharma,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The learned Advocate, Mr Ramesh Kumar appearing on behalf of Mr Kamal Mohan Gupta, Advocate-on-record for the State of Haryana accepts notice and all its departments as well as officers in all concerned SLPs and seeks time to file vakalatnama and counter affidavit. However, it is unfortunate to record that the notices forwarded to such respondents were not accepted by them and concerned officers/office has directed the postal authority to put the registered covers in their postal box kept outside their office.

,ITEM NO.57 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION IVB

-2-

Item No.57

The learned Advocate is requested to convey to the Principal Secretary of the State of Haryana and to place such communication on record confirming that the State Governments and its officers should not refuse to accept notices hereinafter.

Served respondents may file counter affidavit.

Issue fresh notice.

Dasti service is allowed on unserved respondents, if any respondents remain unserved even after direction regarding acceptance of notice by Mr Ram Ral Roy, Advocate.

Served respondents may file vakalatnama and counter affidavit.

List again on 10.9.2010.

(S.G. SHAH) Registrar

hj