Uttam Bir Singh Bedi Judicial Member vs. Union Of India And Ors. Through Secretary
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
2 Jul 2012
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
SECTION XII
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M K HANJURA
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). $6141/2012$ N. BHARATVAJA SHANKAR & ORS. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
UTTAM BIR SINGH BEDI AND ORS
Respondent(s)
WITH SLP(C) No. $19226/2012$ $SLP(C)$ No. 31505/2012 SLP(C) No. $20746/2014$ SLP(C) No. $20824/2014$ (With Office Report)
ITEM NO.13
Date: 10/08/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today.
For Petitioner(s) Mrs. Rekha Palli, Adv. Mr. Mishra Saurabh, Adv. Mr. B. V. Balaram Das, Adv. Mr. Rohit K. Singh, Adv. Mr.Rajendra Singhvi, adv. Mr. Brij Bhusan, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Brij Bhusan, Adv. Ms.Gunwant Dara, adv. Mr. B. V. Balaram Das, Adv. Mr. Mishra Saurabh, Adv. Mr.Jinendra Jain, adv. Ms.Hemani Gupta, adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following ORDER
$\ldots \ldots \ldots \ldots \ldots 2$
SLP(C) No.6141/2012
Mr.Jinendra Jain, Ld.counsel submits that he has already filed the vakalatnama on behalf of the petitioners. Office shall verify the position and report accordingly.
The office report is that the service report in respect of the respondent Nos.3,5 & 6 has not been received from the concerned Court as yet. A reminder shall be issued. Four weeks time as last chance is given to the Ld.counsel to file the affidavit in proof of dasti service of notice already issued to said respondents.
List the matter again on 27.10.2015.
SLP(C) No. 19226/2012
Await the return of the service of notice for making alternative arrangement already issued to the respondent Nos.8 & 9.
The respondent No.7 shall be at liberty to file the counter affidavit within a period of four weeks.
The office report indicates that although by order dated 21.04.2015 of this Court, four weeks time as last chance was given to the Ld.counsel for the petitioners to take fresh steps for the service of notice to the unserved respondent Nos.2-4, yet he has not done the needful within the period stipulated in the order. Viewed in that context, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further future directions. Await orders and list thereafter.
SLP(C) No. 20746/2014
The respondent Nos.1 & 3 have failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules. Service of notice is complete on the respondent Nos.2,4,5 & 6, but no one has
…..........3
entered appearance on their behalf. Mr.Jinendra Jain, Ld.counsel submits that he has already filed the vakalatnama on behalf of the respondent No.7. Office shall verify the position and report accordingly. Ld.counsel seeks and is given three days time to file the counter affidavit.
SLP(C) No. 20824/2014
The respondent Nos.2 & 3 have failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules. Service of notice is complete on the respondent Nos.1,4,5, & 7, but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. Mr.Jinendra Jain, Ld.counsel submits that he has already filed the vakalatnama on behalf of the respondent No.6. Office shall verify the position and report accordingly. Ld.counsel seeks and is given three days time to file the counter affidavit.
List SLP(C) Nos.20746 & 20824/2014 on 14.08.2015.
(M K HANJURA) Registrar
SB